HF Sinclair vs Plains All American Pipeline LP
DINO and PAA side by side, both in industrials. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How DINO and PAA compare
HF Sinclair and Plains All American Pipeline LP are about the same size, with market caps of $20.4B and $18.7B.
Plains All American Pipeline LP grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (12.2% versus −36.2% for HF Sinclair).
HF Sinclair keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 6.1% compared with 5.3% at Plains All American Pipeline LP.
Both pay dividends: HF Sinclair yields 1.8% and Plains All American Pipeline LP 7.7%.
HF Sinclair scores higher on the StockData Score (16 against 11 for Plains All American Pipeline LP), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | DINO | PAA |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $20.4B | $18.7B |
| Share price | $115.00 | $26.51 |
| Change, 1 year | 113% | 56.9% |
| Change, 5 years | 249% | 149% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.48 | 0.47 |
| Employees | 5,165 | 3,900 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 16 (better) | 11 |
| Valuation score | 4 (better) | 3 |
| Growth score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Performance score | 4 (better) | 2 |
| Health score | 5 (better) | 2 |
| Dividend score | 3 | 3 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 11.0× | – |
| P/S | 0.7× | 0.4× (better) |
| P/B | 2.0× | – |
| EV/EBITDA | 6.0× (better) | 10.0× |
| P/FCF | 8.8× | 7.9× (better) |
| FCF yield | 11.3% | 12.7% (better) |
| Fair value | $160.70 | $42.09 |
| Margin of safety | 28.4% | 37.0% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −36.2% | 12.2% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 19.2% (better) | 13.7% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | 204% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 12.9% (better) | 7.8% |
| Operating margin | 8.3% (better) | 3.1% |
| Net margin | 6.1% (better) | 5.3% |
| FCF margin | 7.4% (better) | 4.5% |
| Return on equity | 19.6% | – |
| Return on invested capital | 18.2% | – |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.27 | – |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 0.15 (better) | 2.82 |
| Interest coverage | 14.7× (better) | 2.7× |
| Current ratio | 1.97 (better) | 1.12 |
| Altman Z-score | 4.24 | – |
| Piotroski F-score | 8 (better) | 5 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 1.8% | 7.7% (better) |
| Payout ratio | 19.1% | – |
| Years of dividend growth | 0 | – |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 7.4% | – |
| Buyback yield | 2.7% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 4.5% | 7.7% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 87.6% | 41.0% |
| Held by insiders | 5.7% | 35.0% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $689K (better) | −$51.5K |
| Superinvestors holding | 2 | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 4.2% | – |
Go deeper
- DINO stock overview
- DINO income statement
- DINO valuation and score
- PAA stock overview
- PAA income statement
- PAA valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.