StockData

Enova International vs PicS

ENVA and PICS side by side, both in personal credit institutions. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How ENVA and PICS compare

PicS grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (84.5% versus 20.1% for Enova International).

Enova International keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 10.5% compared with −10.6% at PicS.

Enova International scores higher on the StockData Score (10 against 1 for PicS), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricENVAPICS
Size and price
Market cap$4.2B–
Share price$169.85$7.42
Change, 1 year31.5%–
Change, 5 years329%–
Beta (5Y)1.38–
Employees1,8364,629
StockData Score
Total score10 (better)1
Valuation score2 (better)0
Growth score5 (better)1
Performance score3 (better)0
Health score00
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/E11.7×–
P/S1.1×–
P/B2.6×–
EV/EBITDA4.4×–
P/FCF2.1×–
PEG0.51–
FCF yield48.3%–
Fair value$235.09–
Margin of safety27.8%–
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)20.1%84.5% (better)
Revenue growth, 5Y average23.8%–
Net income growth (TTM)30.5%–
EPS growth (TTM)33.4%402% (better)
EPS growth, 5Y average−0.31%–
Profitability
Gross margin60.6%–
Operating margin24.0% (better)0.35%
Net margin10.5% (better)−10.6%
FCF margin54.9% (better)−37.0%
Return on equity26.8%–
Return on invested capital50.4%–
Financial health
Interest coverage2.3× (better)0.0×
Altman Z-score1.68–
Piotroski F-score8 (better)3
Dividends and buybacks
Buyback yield3.4%–
Shareholder yield3.4%–
Ownership
Held by institutions96.4%11.1%
Held by insiders5.4%95.8%
Insider net buying, 12 months−$72.4M$4.0M (better)
Short interest, % of float7.3%–

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.