Enbridge vs Plains All American Pipeline LP
ENB and PAA side by side, both in industrials. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How ENB and PAA compare
Enbridge grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (29.5% versus 12.2% for Plains All American Pipeline LP).
Enbridge keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 7.3% compared with 5.3% at Plains All American Pipeline LP.
Plains All American Pipeline LP pays a dividend yielding 7.7%; Enbridge does not pay one.
Plains All American Pipeline LP scores higher on the StockData Score (11 against 5 for Enbridge), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | ENB | PAA |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | – | $18.7B |
| Share price | $49.46 | $26.51 |
| Change, 1 year | 6.0% | 56.9% |
| Change, 5 years | 14.2% | 149% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.36 | 0.47 |
| Employees | 15K | 3,900 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 5 | 11 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Growth score | 2 (better) | 1 |
| Performance score | 3 (better) | 2 |
| Health score | 0 | 2 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/S | – | 0.4× |
| EV/EBITDA | – | 10.0× |
| P/FCF | – | 7.9× |
| FCF yield | – | 12.7% |
| Fair value | – | $42.09 |
| Margin of safety | – | 37.0% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 29.5% (better) | 12.2% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 10.8% | 13.7% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −7.6% | 204% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −9.1% | – |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 16.8% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | – | 7.8% |
| Operating margin | 13.3% (better) | 3.1% |
| Net margin | 7.3% (better) | 5.3% |
| FCF margin | 2.0% | 4.5% (better) |
| Return on equity | 9.4% | – |
| Return on invested capital | 5.2% | – |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 1.72 | – |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 6.53 | 2.82 (better) |
| Interest coverage | 2.2× | 2.7× (better) |
| Current ratio | 0.72 | 1.12 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 (better) | 5 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 7.7% |
| Payout ratio | 136% | – |
| Years of dividend growth | 15 | – |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 3.1% | – |
| Shareholder yield | – | 7.7% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 48.8% | 41.0% |
| Held by insiders | 0.00% | 35.0% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | – | −$51.5K |
Go deeper
- ENB stock overview
- ENB income statement
- ENB valuation and score
- PAA stock overview
- PAA income statement
- PAA valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.