StockData

e.l.f. Beauty vs Oddity Tech

ELF and ODD side by side, both in soap, detergents, and cleaning preparations; perfumes, cosmetics, and other toilet preparations. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How ELF and ODD compare

e.l.f. Beauty grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (39.9% versus 25.2% for Oddity Tech).

Oddity Tech keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 13.7% compared with 4.5% at e.l.f. Beauty.

e.l.f. Beauty scores higher on the StockData Score (11 against 10 for Oddity Tech), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricELFODD
Size and price
Market cap$7.0B–
Share price$118.46$19.90
Change, 1 year48.4%−49.6%
Change, 5 years265%–
Beta (5Y)1.441.69
Employees849658
StockData Score
Total score11 (better)10
Valuation score1 (better)0
Growth score44
Performance score35 (better)
Health score3 (better)1
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/E81.7×–
P/S3.6×–
P/B5.7×–
EV/EBITDA27.6×–
P/FCF25.4×–
FCF yield3.9%–
Fair value$93.52–
Margin of safety−26.7%–
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)39.9% (better)25.2%
Revenue growth, 5Y average38.8%–
Net income growth (TTM)5.9%9.1% (better)
EPS growth (TTM)2.1%9.8% (better)
EPS growth, 5Y average29.7%–
Profitability
Gross margin74.4% (better)72.7%
Operating margin8.9%14.7% (better)
Net margin4.5%13.7% (better)
FCF margin14.2% (better)10.3%
Return on equity7.3%32.6% (better)
Return on invested capital6.5%60.9% (better)
Financial health
Debt / equity0.67 (better)1.47
Net debt / EBITDA1.75 (better)−1.48
Current ratio2.575.24 (better)
Altman Z-score4.35–
Piotroski F-score45 (better)
Dividends and buybacks
Buyback yield1.3%–
Shareholder yield1.3%–
Ownership
Held by institutions87.8%66.4%
Held by insiders3.1%24.4%
Insider net buying, 12 months−$35.7M−$3.0M (better)
Short interest, % of float7.3%8.3%

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.