StockData

eHealth vs Zhibao Technology

EHTH and ZBAO side by side, both in insurance agents, brokers, and service. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How EHTH and ZBAO compare

Zhibao Technology grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (50.8% versus −13.6% for eHealth).

eHealth keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 4.9% compared with −22.4% at Zhibao Technology.

eHealth scores higher on the StockData Score (8 against 3 for Zhibao Technology), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricEHTHZBAO
Size and price
Market cap$14.1M–
Share price$0.440$0.211
Change, 1 year−89.4%−99.6%
Change, 5 years−98.2%–
Beta (5Y)1.601.49
Employees1,66565
StockData Score
Total score8 (better)3
Valuation score2 (better)0
Growth score23 (better)
Performance score2 (better)0
Health score2 (better)0
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/S0.0×–
P/B0.0×–
EV/EBITDA0.8×–
FCF yield−122%–
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)−13.6%50.8% (better)
Revenue growth, 5Y average−1.0%–
Net income growth (TTM)−54.4% (better)−568%
EPS growth (TTM)−955%−541% (better)
Profitability
Gross margin44.7% (better)41.0%
Operating margin10.6% (better)−19.3%
Net margin4.9% (better)−22.4%
FCF margin−3.7%–
Return on equity4.6% (better)−134%
Return on invested capital6.2%–
Financial health
Debt / equity0.23 (better)1.79
Net debt / EBITDA0.55–
Interest coverage3.2×–
Current ratio8.68 (better)0.86
Altman Z-score0.85–
Piotroski F-score4 (better)3
Dividends and buybacks
Shareholder yield0.00%–
Ownership
Held by institutions56.9%0.01%
Held by insiders11.7%72.3%
Insider net buying, 12 months$188K–
Short interest, % of float2.8%–

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.