Everest vs SiriusPoint
EG and SPNT side by side, both in fire, marine, and casualty insurance. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How EG and SPNT compare
Everest is the larger company, worth 5.1 times as much as SiriusPoint ($15.8B against $3.1B).
On earnings, SiriusPoint is cheaper: it trades at 6.7× trailing earnings, against 9.0× for Everest.
SiriusPoint grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (18.1% versus −8.7% for Everest).
SiriusPoint keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 14.9% compared with 11.7% at Everest.
Everest pays a dividend yielding 1.4%; SiriusPoint does not pay one.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | EG | SPNT |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $15.8B | $3.1B |
| Share price | $427.19 | $26.57 |
| Change, 1 year | 31.4% | 31.1% |
| Change, 5 years | 59.9% | 212% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.40 | 0.61 |
| Employees | 3,064 | 1,072 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 13 | 13 |
| Valuation score | 6 (better) | 5 |
| Growth score | 2 | 3 (better) |
| Performance score | 2 | 5 (better) |
| Health score | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend score | 3 (better) | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 9.0× | 6.7× (better) |
| P/S | 1.0× | 0.9× (better) |
| P/B | 1.1× (better) | 1.4× |
| PEG | 0.25 | – |
| Fair value | $595.20 | $31.36 |
| Margin of safety | 28.2% (better) | 15.3% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −8.7% | 18.1% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 12.8% | 29.2% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 243% (better) | 153% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 256% (better) | 147% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 24.2% (better) | 18.9% |
| Profitability | ||
| Net margin | 11.7% | 14.9% (better) |
| Return on equity | 12.8% | 22.6% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Altman Z-score | 0.86 (better) | 0.61 |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 | 6 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 1.4% | – |
| Payout ratio | 16.7% | 0.00% |
| Years of dividend growth | 4 | – |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 5.2% | – |
| Buyback yield | 10.1% (better) | 3.3% |
| Shareholder yield | 11.5% (better) | 3.3% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 105% | 83.9% |
| Held by insiders | 1.6% | 60.9% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$3.4M | – |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 4.2% | 11.6% |
Go deeper
- EG stock overview
- EG income statement
- EG valuation and score
- SPNT stock overview
- SPNT income statement
- SPNT valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.