Arch Capital vs Everest
ACGL and EG side by side, both in fire, marine, and casualty insurance. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How ACGL and EG compare
Arch Capital is the larger company, worth 2.3 times as much as Everest ($36.3B against $15.8B).
On earnings, Arch Capital is cheaper: it trades at 8.3× trailing earnings, against 8.7× for Everest.
Arch Capital grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (0.40% versus −8.7% for Everest).
Arch Capital keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 24.4% compared with 11.7% at Everest.
Everest pays a dividend yielding 1.5%; Arch Capital does not pay one.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | ACGL | EG |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $36.3B | $15.8B |
| Share price | $106.36 | $410.97 |
| Change, 1 year | 23.9% | 32.8% |
| Change, 5 years | 145% | 50.2% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.41 | 0.40 |
| Employees | 8,000 | 3,064 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 13 | 13 |
| Valuation score | 4 | 6 (better) |
| Growth score | 3 (better) | 2 |
| Performance score | 6 (better) | 2 |
| Health score | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 8.3× (better) | 8.7× |
| P/S | 1.9× | 1.0× (better) |
| P/B | 1.5× | 1.1× (better) |
| P/FCF | 6.0× | – |
| PEG | 0.18 (better) | 0.24 |
| FCF yield | 16.7% | – |
| Fair value | $118.54 | $580.32 |
| Margin of safety | 10.3% | 29.2% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 0.40% (better) | −8.7% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 18.6% (better) | 12.8% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 25.7% | 243% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 32.1% | 256% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 28.4% (better) | 24.2% |
| Profitability | ||
| Net margin | 24.4% (better) | 11.7% |
| FCF margin | 31.5% | – |
| Return on equity | 19.9% (better) | 12.8% |
| Financial health | ||
| Altman Z-score | 1.06 (better) | 0.86 |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 | 6 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 1.5% (better) |
| Payout ratio | – | 16.7% |
| Years of dividend growth | 0 | 4 (better) |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | 5.2% |
| Buyback yield | 9.6% | 10.1% (better) |
| Shareholder yield | 9.6% | 11.6% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 91.6% | 102% |
| Held by insiders | 5.5% | 1.6% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$28.7M | −$273K (better) |
| Superinvestors holding | – | 1 |
| Short interest, % of float | – | 4.4% |
Go deeper
- ACGL stock overview
- ACGL income statement
- ACGL valuation and score
- EG stock overview
- EG income statement
- EG valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.