Euronet Worldwide vs NCR Atleos
EEFT and NATL side by side. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How EEFT and NATL compare
NCR Atleos is the larger company, worth 1.4 times as much as Euronet Worldwide ($3.6B against $2.6B).
On earnings, Euronet Worldwide is cheaper: it trades at 11.5× trailing earnings, against 13.7× for NCR Atleos.
Euronet Worldwide grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (5.0% versus 2.0% for NCR Atleos).
Euronet Worldwide keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 6.4% compared with 6.1% at NCR Atleos.
Euronet Worldwide scores higher on the StockData Score (12 against 11 for NCR Atleos), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | EEFT | NATL |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $2.6B | $3.6B |
| Share price | $70.49 | $48.20 |
| Change, 1 year | −1.6% | 34.3% |
| Change, 5 years | −35.8% | 66.2% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.05 | −0.36 |
| Employees | 10K | 20K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 12 (better) | 11 |
| Valuation score | 5 | 5 |
| Growth score | 1 | 1 |
| Performance score | 4 | 5 (better) |
| Health score | 2 (better) | 0 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 11.5× (better) | 13.7× |
| P/S | 0.6× (better) | 0.8× |
| P/B | 2.1× (better) | 6.3× |
| EV/EBITDA | 6.1× (better) | 6.7× |
| P/FCF | 8.6× (better) | 11.5× |
| PEG | 0.73 (better) | 0.90 |
| FCF yield | 11.6% (better) | 8.7% |
| Fair value | $104.08 | $106.59 |
| Margin of safety | 32.3% | 54.8% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 5.0% (better) | 2.0% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 11.3% | – |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −7.7% | 123% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −10.5% | 119% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Operating margin | 11.0% | 13.2% (better) |
| Net margin | 6.4% (better) | 6.1% |
| FCF margin | 7.0% | 7.0% (better) |
| Return on equity | 22.0% | 59.7% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | 12.5% | 17.0% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 1.70 (better) | 4.51 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 1.91 (better) | 2.60 |
| Interest coverage | 6.8× (better) | 2.3× |
| Current ratio | 1.42 (better) | 0.90 |
| Altman Z-score | 2.12 (better) | 1.66 |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 | 6 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Buyback yield | 16.1% (better) | 1.2% |
| Shareholder yield | 16.1% (better) | 1.2% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 103% | 95.8% |
| Held by insiders | 7.6% | 1.7% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $231K (better) | $0 |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 16.0% | 3.7% |
Go deeper
- EEFT stock overview
- EEFT income statement
- EEFT valuation and score
- NATL stock overview
- NATL income statement
- NATL valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.