DiamondRock Hospitality vs Ryman Hospitality Properties
DRH and RHP side by side, both in miscellaneous investing. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How DRH and RHP compare
Ryman Hospitality Properties is the larger company, worth 2.9 times as much as DiamondRock Hospitality ($8.4B against $2.9B).
On earnings, DiamondRock Hospitality is cheaper: it trades at 19.8× trailing earnings, against 33.1× for Ryman Hospitality Properties.
Ryman Hospitality Properties grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (12.2% versus 1.0% for DiamondRock Hospitality).
DiamondRock Hospitality keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 13.5% compared with 9.9% at Ryman Hospitality Properties.
Both pay dividends: DiamondRock Hospitality yields 2.9% and Ryman Hospitality Properties 3.6%.
DiamondRock Hospitality scores higher on the StockData Score (9 against 7 for Ryman Hospitality Properties), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | DRH | RHP |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $2.9B | $8.4B |
| Share price | $14.25 | $133.18 |
| Change, 1 year | 81.5% | 53.7% |
| Change, 5 years | 35.2% | 39.9% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.02 | 0.89 |
| Employees | 35 | 1,819 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 9 (better) | 7 |
| Valuation score | 3 (better) | 0 |
| Growth score | 1 | 4 (better) |
| Performance score | 3 (better) | 2 |
| Health score | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend score | 2 (better) | 1 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 19.8× (better) | 33.1× |
| P/S | 2.6× (better) | 3.1× |
| P/B | 1.9× (better) | 11.2× |
| EV/EBITDA | – | 9.6× |
| PEG | – | 1.90 |
| Fair value | $15.25 | $112.08 |
| Margin of safety | 6.6% (better) | −18.8% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 1.0% | 12.2% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 30.2% | 37.5% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 126% (better) | 3.6% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 177% (better) | −1.5% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | – | 43.8% |
| Operating margin | – | 19.8% |
| Net margin | 13.5% (better) | 9.9% |
| Return on equity | 9.9% | 35.1% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | – | 136% |
| Financial health | ||
| Interest coverage | – | 2.1× |
| Altman Z-score | 1.24 | 1.75 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 7 (better) | 6 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 2.9% | 3.6% (better) |
| Payout ratio | 49.9% | 110% |
| Years of dividend growth | 3 | 3 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | 37.4% |
| Buyback yield | 0.52% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 3.4% | 3.6% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 113% | 101% |
| Held by insiders | 1.3% | 3.1% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$482K | $1.6M (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | 6.5% | 5.5% |
Go deeper
- DRH stock overview
- DRH income statement
- DRH valuation and score
- RHP stock overview
- RHP income statement
- RHP valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.