Dominos Pizza vs Sysco
DPZ and SYY side by side, both in groceries and related products. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How DPZ and SYY compare
Sysco is the larger company, worth 3.8 times as much as Dominos Pizza ($39.7B against $10.4B).
On earnings, Dominos Pizza is cheaper: it trades at 17.3× trailing earnings, against 22.7× for Sysco.
Dominos Pizza grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (4.5% versus 3.9% for Sysco).
Dominos Pizza keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 12.0% compared with 2.1% at Sysco.
Both pay dividends: Dominos Pizza yields 2.5% and Sysco 2.6%.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | DPZ | SYY |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $10.4B | $39.7B |
| Share price | $313.71 | $82.90 |
| Change, 1 year | −22.7% | 11.6% |
| Change, 5 years | −36.7% | 2.0% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.77 | 0.50 |
| Employees | 10K | 75K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 16 | 16 |
| Valuation score | 5 (better) | 3 |
| Growth score | 2 (better) | 1 |
| Performance score | 4 | 5 (better) |
| Health score | 1 | 3 (better) |
| Dividend score | 4 | 4 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 17.3× (better) | 22.7× |
| P/S | 2.0× | 0.5× (better) |
| P/B | – | 14.9× |
| EV/EBITDA | 13.8× | 12.6× (better) |
| P/FCF | 16.3× (better) | 20.5× |
| PEG | 1.45 (better) | 12.63 |
| FCF yield | 6.1% (better) | 4.9% |
| Fair value | $431.31 | $89.25 |
| Margin of safety | 27.3% (better) | 7.1% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 4.5% (better) | 3.9% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 3.7% | 10.5% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 3.4% (better) | −3.9% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 6.1% (better) | −1.9% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 7.2% | 29.1% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 40.0% (better) | 18.5% |
| Operating margin | 19.7% (better) | 3.7% |
| Net margin | 12.0% (better) | 2.1% |
| FCF margin | 12.5% (better) | 2.3% |
| Return on equity | – | 78.2% |
| Return on invested capital | 110% (better) | 16.8% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | – | 5.07 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 4.28 | 2.88 (better) |
| Interest coverage | 5.0× | – |
| Current ratio | 0.49 | 1.28 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 2.04 | 4.39 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 8 (better) | 7 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 2.5% | 2.6% (better) |
| Payout ratio | 41.3% | 59.0% |
| Years of dividend growth | 12 | 17 (better) |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 17.4% (better) | 3.6% |
| Buyback yield | 3.7% (better) | 0.50% |
| Shareholder yield | 6.2% (better) | 3.1% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 111% | 88.4% |
| Held by insiders | 0.59% | 0.27% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$14.7M | −$986K (better) |
| Superinvestors holding | 2 | 4 (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | 7.9% | 2.5% |
Go deeper
- DPZ stock overview
- DPZ income statement
- DPZ valuation and score
- SYY stock overview
- SYY income statement
- SYY valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.