Performance Food vs Sysco
PFGC and SYY side by side, both in groceries and related products. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How PFGC and SYY compare
Sysco is the larger company, worth 2.5 times as much as Performance Food ($39.7B against $15.6B).
On earnings, Sysco is cheaper: it trades at 22.7× trailing earnings, against 43.3× for Performance Food.
Performance Food grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (7.2% versus 3.9% for Sysco).
Sysco keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 2.1% compared with 0.53% at Performance Food.
Sysco pays a dividend yielding 2.6%; Performance Food does not pay one.
Sysco scores higher on the StockData Score (16 against 9 for Performance Food), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | PFGC | SYY |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $15.6B | $39.7B |
| Share price | $99.05 | $82.90 |
| Change, 1 year | 0.70% | 11.6% |
| Change, 5 years | 104% | 2.0% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.97 | 0.50 |
| Employees | 44K | 75K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 9 | 16 (better) |
| Valuation score | 1 | 3 (better) |
| Growth score | 2 (better) | 1 |
| Performance score | 2 | 5 (better) |
| Health score | 4 (better) | 3 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 4 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 43.3× | 22.7× (better) |
| P/S | 0.2× (better) | 0.5× |
| P/B | 3.2× (better) | 14.9× |
| EV/EBITDA | 12.1× (better) | 12.6× |
| P/FCF | 15.2× (better) | 20.5× |
| PEG | – | 12.63 |
| FCF yield | 6.6% (better) | 4.9% |
| Fair value | $86.47 | $89.25 |
| Margin of safety | −14.5% | 7.1% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 7.2% (better) | 3.9% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 17.4% (better) | 10.5% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 5.6% (better) | −3.9% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 5.0% (better) | −1.9% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 50.2% (better) | 29.1% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 11.9% | 18.5% (better) |
| Operating margin | 1.3% | 3.7% (better) |
| Net margin | 0.53% | 2.1% (better) |
| FCF margin | 1.5% | 2.3% (better) |
| Return on equity | 7.7% | 78.2% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | 6.7% | 16.8% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 1.02 (better) | 5.07 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 2.89 | 2.88 (better) |
| Interest coverage | 2.1× | – |
| Current ratio | 1.51 (better) | 1.28 |
| Altman Z-score | 4.74 (better) | 4.39 |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 | 7 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 2.6% |
| Payout ratio | – | 59.0% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 17 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | 3.6% |
| Buyback yield | 0.01% | 0.50% (better) |
| Shareholder yield | 0.01% | 3.1% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 101% | 88.4% |
| Held by insiders | 2.0% | 0.27% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$28.0M | −$986K (better) |
| Superinvestors holding | 3 | 4 (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | 3.2% | 2.5% |
Go deeper
- PFGC stock overview
- PFGC income statement
- PFGC valuation and score
- SYY stock overview
- SYY income statement
- SYY valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.