DraftKings vs Hasbro
DKNG and HAS side by side. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How DKNG and HAS compare
DraftKings and Hasbro are about the same size, with market caps of $17.5B and $17.3B.
Hasbro grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (27.6% versus 17.4% for DraftKings).
Hasbro keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 15.6% compared with −5.9% at DraftKings.
Hasbro pays a dividend yielding 2.3%; DraftKings does not pay one.
Hasbro scores higher on the StockData Score (15 against 8 for DraftKings), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | DKNG | HAS |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $17.5B | $17.3B |
| Share price | $19.64 | $124.02 |
| Change, 1 year | −35.7% | 58.7% |
| Change, 5 years | −45.7% | 23.4% |
| Beta (5Y) | 2.17 | 0.83 |
| Employees | 5,500 | 4,520 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 8 | 15 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Growth score | 3 | 3 |
| Performance score | 1 | 2 (better) |
| Health score | 4 | 4 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 18.5× |
| P/S | 2.7× (better) | 2.8× |
| P/B | 97.2× | – |
| EV/EBITDA | – | 13.7× |
| P/FCF | 53.9× | 14.1× (better) |
| FCF yield | 1.9% | 7.1% (better) |
| Fair value | $2.35 | $128.43 |
| Margin of safety | −734% | 3.4% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 17.4% | 27.6% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 58.0% (better) | −0.37% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 40.5% | 78.0% (better) |
| Operating margin | −6.3% | 21.9% (better) |
| Net margin | −5.9% | 15.6% (better) |
| FCF margin | 5.1% | 20.1% (better) |
| Return on equity | −83.1% | – |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | – |
| Net debt / EBITDA | – | 1.82 |
| Interest coverage | – | 7.8× |
| Current ratio | 0.99 | 1.40 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 1.35 | 4.16 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 8 (better) | 6 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 2.3% |
| Payout ratio | – | 41.3% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 1 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | 0.58% |
| Buyback yield | 2.4% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 2.4% (better) | 2.3% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 45.9% | 99.1% |
| Held by insiders | 1.5% | 0.64% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$16.4M (better) | −$50.7M |
| Superinvestors holding | – | 1 |
| Short interest, % of float | 4.9% | 4.6% |
Go deeper
- DKNG stock overview
- DKNG income statement
- DKNG valuation and score
- HAS stock overview
- HAS income statement
- HAS valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.