Walt Disney vs DraftKings
DIS and DKNG side by side, both in miscellaneous amusement and recreation. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How DIS and DKNG compare
Walt Disney is the larger company, worth 10 times as much as DraftKings ($192B against $18.6B).
DraftKings grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (15.0% versus 4.6% for Walt Disney).
Walt Disney keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 8.7% compared with −2.7% at DraftKings.
Walt Disney pays a dividend yielding 1.4%; DraftKings does not pay one.
Walt Disney scores higher on the StockData Score (15 against 9 for DraftKings), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | DIS | DKNG |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $192B | $18.6B |
| Share price | $110.94 | $20.91 |
| Change, 1 year | 0.63% | −31.8% |
| Change, 5 years | −36.8% | −52.1% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.08 | 2.15 |
| Employees | 231K | 5,500 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 15 (better) | 9 |
| Valuation score | 6 (better) | 0 |
| Growth score | 2 | 3 (better) |
| Performance score | 3 (better) | 1 |
| Health score | 3 | 5 (better) |
| Dividend score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 22.9× | – |
| P/S | 1.9× (better) | 3.0× |
| P/B | 1.7× (better) | 32.7× |
| EV/EBITDA | 10.1× (better) | 161× |
| P/FCF | 23.1× (better) | 28.6× |
| PEG | 0.39 | – |
| FCF yield | 4.3% (better) | 3.5% |
| Fair value | $181.19 | $3.30 |
| Margin of safety | 38.8% (better) | −533% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 4.6% | 15.0% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 7.6% | 58.0% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −25.5% | – |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −24.0% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | – | 40.5% |
| Operating margin | 18.4% (better) | −2.9% |
| Net margin | 8.7% (better) | −2.7% |
| FCF margin | 8.4% | 10.5% (better) |
| Return on equity | 7.8% (better) | −21.1% |
| Return on invested capital | 8.9% | – |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.42 (better) | 0.00 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 1.72 | – |
| Current ratio | 0.71 | 1.02 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 2.47 (better) | 2.21 |
| Piotroski F-score | 7 | 8 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 1.4% | – |
| Buyback yield | 4.3% (better) | 2.6% |
| Shareholder yield | 5.7% (better) | 2.6% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 76.8% | 45.9% |
| Held by insiders | 0.05% | 1.5% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $21.6K (better) | −$17.5M |
| Superinvestors holding | 9 | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 1.1% | 4.3% |
Go deeper
- DIS stock overview
- DIS income statement
- DIS valuation and score
- DKNG stock overview
- DKNG income statement
- DKNG valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.