AMCON Distributing vs Performance Food
DIT and PFGC side by side, both in groceries and related products. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How DIT and PFGC compare
Performance Food is the larger company, worth 256 times as much as AMCON Distributing ($15.6B against $61.0M).
On earnings, AMCON Distributing is cheaper: it trades at 33.0× trailing earnings, against 43.3× for Performance Food.
AMCON Distributing grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (7.5% versus 7.2% for Performance Food).
Performance Food keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 0.53% compared with 0.06% at AMCON Distributing.
AMCON Distributing pays a dividend yielding 0.77%; Performance Food does not pay one.
AMCON Distributing scores higher on the StockData Score (15 against 9 for Performance Food), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | DIT | PFGC |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $61.0M | $15.6B |
| Share price | $62.50 | $99.05 |
| Change, 1 year | −19.5% | 0.70% |
| Change, 5 years | −26.8% | 104% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.15 | 0.97 |
| Employees | 756 | 44K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 15 (better) | 9 |
| Valuation score | 4 (better) | 1 |
| Growth score | 3 (better) | 2 |
| Performance score | 0 | 2 (better) |
| Health score | 5 (better) | 4 |
| Dividend score | 3 (better) | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 33.0× (better) | 43.3× |
| P/S | 0.0× (better) | 0.2× |
| P/B | 0.5× (better) | 3.2× |
| EV/EBITDA | 2.8× (better) | 12.1× |
| P/FCF | 22.4× | 15.2× (better) |
| FCF yield | 4.5% | 6.6% (better) |
| Fair value | $241.82 | $86.47 |
| Margin of safety | 74.2% (better) | −14.5% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 7.5% (better) | 7.2% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 13.1% | 17.4% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 36.8% (better) | 5.6% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 32.4% (better) | 5.0% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | −37.6% | 50.2% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 6.3% | 11.9% (better) |
| Operating margin | 0.44% | 1.3% (better) |
| Net margin | 0.06% | 0.53% (better) |
| FCF margin | 0.09% | 1.5% (better) |
| Return on equity | 1.6% | 7.7% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | 7.0% (better) | 6.7% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.04 (better) | 1.02 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 0.18 (better) | 2.89 |
| Interest coverage | 1.3× | 2.1× (better) |
| Current ratio | 2.75 (better) | 1.51 |
| Altman Z-score | 8.68 (better) | 4.74 |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 | 5 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 0.77% | – |
| Payout ratio | 36.4% | – |
| Years of dividend growth | 0 | – |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 0.00% | – |
| Buyback yield | – | 0.01% |
| Shareholder yield | 0.77% (better) | 0.01% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 10.8% | 101% |
| Held by insiders | 48.7% | 2.0% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | – | −$28.0M |
| Superinvestors holding | – | 3 |
| Short interest, % of float | 0.16% | 3.2% |
Go deeper
- DIT stock overview
- DIT income statement
- DIT valuation and score
- PFGC stock overview
- PFGC income statement
- PFGC valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.