StockData

HF Sinclair vs South Bow

DINO and SOBO side by side, both in industrials. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How DINO and SOBO compare

South Bow grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (−6.3% versus −28.9% for HF Sinclair).

HF Sinclair pays a dividend yielding 2.0%; South Bow does not pay one.

HF Sinclair scores higher on the StockData Score (18 against 3 for South Bow), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricDINOSOBO
Size and price
Market cap$17.5B–
Share price$102.18$33.32
Change, 1 year87.9%25.0%
Change, 5 years228%–
Beta (5Y)0.53−0.04
Employees5,165–
StockData Score
Total score18 (better)3
Valuation score6 (better)0
Growth score02 (better)
Performance score4 (better)0
Health score5 (better)1
Dividend score3 (better)0
Valuation
P/E5.2×–
P/S0.5×–
P/B1.5×–
EV/EBITDA3.0×–
P/FCF5.4×–
FCF yield18.7%–
Fair value$319.70–
Margin of safety68.0%–
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)−28.9%−6.3% (better)
Revenue growth, 5Y average19.2%–
Net income growth (TTM)797%–
EPS growth (TTM)844% (better)36.2%
Profitability
Gross margin18.0%84.2% (better)
Operating margin13.5%–
Net margin10.1%–
FCF margin9.4%–
Return on equity33.4%–
Return on invested capital32.8%–
Financial health
Debt / equity0.24–
Net debt / EBITDA−0.10–
Interest coverage26.2×–
Current ratio2.27 (better)1.50
Altman Z-score4.49–
Piotroski F-score8–
Dividends and buybacks
Dividend yield2.0%–
Payout ratio10.3%–
Years of dividend growth0–
Dividend growth, 5Y average7.4%–
Buyback yield5.0%–
Shareholder yield7.0%–
Ownership
Held by institutions90.9%62.0%
Held by insiders3.3%0.00%
Insider net buying, 12 months$1.8M–
Superinvestors holding2–
Short interest, % of float3.6%4.8%

Go deeper

Other comparisons

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.