Douglas Emmett vs Rexford Industrial Realty
DEI and REXR side by side, both in miscellaneous investing. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How DEI and REXR compare
Rexford Industrial Realty is the larger company, worth 5.0 times as much as Douglas Emmett ($8.5B against $1.7B).
Douglas Emmett grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (0.78% versus 0.55% for Rexford Industrial Realty).
Douglas Emmett keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −2.3% compared with −39.2% at Rexford Industrial Realty.
Both pay dividends: Douglas Emmett yields 7.5% and Rexford Industrial Realty 4.5%.
Rexford Industrial Realty scores higher on the StockData Score (8 against 7 for Douglas Emmett), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | DEI | REXR |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $1.7B | $8.5B |
| Share price | $10.13 | $38.22 |
| Change, 1 year | −20.2% | −7.8% |
| Change, 5 years | −71.6% | −43.8% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.97 | 0.89 |
| Employees | 778 | 256 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 7 | 8 (better) |
| Valuation score | 3 (better) | 1 |
| Growth score | 1 | 2 (better) |
| Performance score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Health score | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend score | 3 | 4 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/S | 1.7× (better) | 8.6× |
| P/B | 0.9× (better) | 1.1× |
| Fair value | $19.83 | $32.79 |
| Margin of safety | 48.9% (better) | −16.6% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 0.78% (better) | 0.55% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 2.4% | 24.9% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −161% (better) | −222% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −168% (better) | −234% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | −20.3% | 11.0% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 63.2% | – |
| Net margin | −2.3% (better) | −39.2% |
| Return on equity | −1.2% (better) | −4.7% |
| Financial health | ||
| Altman Z-score | 0.04 | 1.45 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 (better) | 4 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 7.5% (better) | 4.5% |
| Years of dividend growth | 0 | 8 (better) |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | −7.5% | 14.9% (better) |
| Buyback yield | – | 6.5% |
| Shareholder yield | 7.5% | 11.0% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 113% | 106% |
| Held by insiders | 4.8% | 0.44% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $1.5M (better) | −$3.9M |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | 1 |
| Short interest, % of float | 19.8% | 5.4% |
Go deeper
- DEI stock overview
- DEI income statement
- DEI valuation and score
- REXR stock overview
- REXR income statement
- REXR valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.