Deere vs Toro
DE and TTC side by side, both in industrial and commercial machinery and computer equipment. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How DE and TTC compare
Deere is the larger company, worth 18 times as much as Toro ($182B against $10.2B).
On earnings, Toro is cheaper: it trades at 28.9× trailing earnings, against 37.5× for Deere.
Deere grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (8.0% versus 5.2% for Toro).
Deere keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 10.2% compared with 7.6% at Toro.
Both pay dividends: Deere yields 0.96% and Toro 1.4%.
Toro scores higher on the StockData Score (16 against 11 for Deere), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | DE | TTC |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $182B | $10.2B |
| Share price | $675.48 | $107.96 |
| Change, 1 year | 42.7% | 43.6% |
| Change, 5 years | 90.2% | 9.2% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.80 | 0.97 |
| Employees | 73K | – |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 11 | 16 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Growth score | 1 | 3 (better) |
| Performance score | 4 | 4 |
| Health score | 2 | 4 (better) |
| Dividend score | 4 | 4 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 37.5× | 28.9× (better) |
| P/S | 3.8× | 2.2× (better) |
| P/B | 6.5× (better) | 7.6× |
| EV/EBITDA | 16.3× (better) | 17.3× |
| P/FCF | 30.2× | 14.4× (better) |
| FCF yield | 3.3% | 7.0% (better) |
| Fair value | $454.94 | $93.72 |
| Margin of safety | −48.5% | −15.2% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 8.0% (better) | 5.2% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 5.2% | 5.9% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −6.4% | 9.1% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −5.9% | 13.3% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 16.3% (better) | 0.91% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | – | 33.4% |
| Operating margin | – | 10.3% |
| Net margin | 10.2% (better) | 7.6% |
| FCF margin | 12.5% | 15.0% (better) |
| Return on equity | 18.3% | 26.4% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | – | 17.6% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.61 (better) | 0.72 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 0.70 (better) | 1.24 |
| Interest coverage | – | 8.7× |
| Current ratio | – | 1.58 |
| Altman Z-score | 2.63 | 5.33 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 | 6 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 0.96% | 1.4% (better) |
| Payout ratio | 36.0% | 41.3% |
| Years of dividend growth | 5 | 16 (better) |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 15.8% (better) | 8.7% |
| Buyback yield | 0.38% | 3.5% (better) |
| Shareholder yield | 1.3% | 4.9% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 75.4% | 94.3% |
| Held by insiders | 0.16% | 0.39% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$55.9M | −$14.2M (better) |
| Superinvestors holding | 4 | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 2.1% | 4.3% |
Go deeper
- DE stock overview
- DE income statement
- DE valuation and score
- TTC stock overview
- TTC income statement
- TTC valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.