Dominion Energy vs NRG Energy
D and NRG side by side, both in electric services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How D and NRG compare
Dominion Energy is the larger company, worth 2.9 times as much as NRG Energy ($59.5B against $20.4B).
On earnings, NRG Energy is cheaper: it trades at 17.1× trailing earnings, against 22.5× for Dominion Energy.
Dominion Energy grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (21.5% versus 17.4% for NRG Energy).
Dominion Energy keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 14.0% compared with 3.6% at NRG Energy.
Both pay dividends: Dominion Energy yields 3.9% and NRG Energy 1.5%.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | D | NRG |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $59.5B | $20.4B |
| Share price | $67.66 | $97.10 |
| Change, 1 year | 10.2% | −42.5% |
| Change, 5 years | −8.8% | 168% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.32 | 1.11 |
| Employees | 15K | 17K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 7 | 7 |
| Valuation score | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Growth score | 2 | 2 |
| Performance score | 2 (better) | 1 |
| Health score | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend score | 3 (better) | 1 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 22.5× | 17.1× (better) |
| P/S | 3.1× | 0.6× (better) |
| P/B | 2.0× | – |
| EV/EBITDA | 17.2× | 9.6× (better) |
| P/FCF | – | 29.6× |
| PEG | 0.60 | – |
| FCF yield | – | 3.4% |
| Fair value | $62.64 | $105.80 |
| Margin of safety | −8.0% | 8.2% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 21.5% (better) | 17.4% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 3.1% | 27.6% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 4.8% (better) | −12.7% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 2.0% (better) | −15.0% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | 14.1% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | – | 20.2% |
| Operating margin | 22.5% (better) | 7.7% |
| Net margin | 14.0% (better) | 3.6% |
| FCF margin | – | 2.0% |
| Return on equity | 9.4% | – |
| Return on invested capital | 4.7% | – |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 1.85 | – |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 7.85 | 5.06 (better) |
| Interest coverage | – | 2.4× |
| Current ratio | 0.88 | 0.99 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 0.68 | 1.53 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 | 6 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 3.9% (better) | 1.5% |
| Payout ratio | 86.7% | – |
| Years of dividend growth | 0 | 6 (better) |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | −5.0% | 8.0% (better) |
| Buyback yield | −2.4% | 6.5% (better) |
| Shareholder yield | 1.6% | 8.0% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 81.0% | 94.5% |
| Held by insiders | 0.12% | 4.5% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | – | −$5.3B |
| Superinvestors holding | – | 1 |
| Short interest, % of float | 2.8% | 2.9% |
Go deeper
- D stock overview
- D income statement
- D valuation and score
- NRG stock overview
- NRG income statement
- NRG valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.