Cemex SAB de CV vs Owens Corning
CX and OC side by side, both in materials. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How CX and OC compare
Cemex SAB de CV grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (0.43% versus −7.2% for Owens Corning).
Cemex SAB de CV keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 6.0% compared with −6.8% at Owens Corning.
Owens Corning pays a dividend yielding 2.6%; Cemex SAB de CV does not pay one.
Owens Corning scores higher on the StockData Score (6 against 5 for Cemex SAB de CV), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | CX | OC |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | – | $9.6B |
| Share price | $10.70 | $121.15 |
| Change, 1 year | 4.2% | −2.8% |
| Change, 5 years | 68.8% | 27.0% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.28 | 1.25 |
| Employees | 40K | 25K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 5 | 6 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Performance score | 3 (better) | 0 |
| Health score | 2 | 2 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/S | – | 1.0× |
| P/B | – | 2.5× |
| EV/EBITDA | – | 17.9× |
| P/FCF | – | 10.7× |
| FCF yield | – | 9.4% |
| Fair value | – | $76.61 |
| Margin of safety | – | −58.1% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 0.43% (better) | −7.2% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 5.0% | 7.4% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 2.2% (better) | −302% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 2.3% (better) | −311% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 32.9% (better) | 26.0% |
| Operating margin | 6.2% (better) | 0.51% |
| Net margin | 6.0% (better) | −6.8% |
| FCF margin | 6.4% | 9.1% (better) |
| Return on equity | 7.5% (better) | −15.0% |
| Return on invested capital | 3.0% (better) | 0.43% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.42 (better) | 1.14 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 1.66 (better) | 5.28 |
| Interest coverage | – | 0.1× |
| Current ratio | 0.83 | 1.16 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | – | 1.97 |
| Piotroski F-score | 7 (better) | 3 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 2.6% |
| Payout ratio | 13.2% | – |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 12 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | 23.9% |
| Buyback yield | – | 7.1% |
| Shareholder yield | – | 9.7% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 3.7% | 106% |
| Held by insiders | 2.7% | 1.3% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$4.7M | −$447K (better) |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | 2 (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | – | 3.1% |
Go deeper
- CX stock overview
- CX income statement
- CX valuation and score
- OC stock overview
- OC income statement
- OC valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.