CRH Public vs Owens Corning
CRH and OC side by side, both in materials. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How CRH and OC compare
CRH Public is the larger company, worth 6.3 times as much as Owens Corning ($60.3B against $9.6B).
CRH Public grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (5.6% versus −7.2% for Owens Corning).
CRH Public keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 9.2% compared with −6.8% at Owens Corning.
Both pay dividends: CRH Public yields 1.3% and Owens Corning 2.6%.
CRH Public scores higher on the StockData Score (15 against 6 for Owens Corning), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | CRH | OC |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $60.3B | $9.6B |
| Share price | $90.62 | $121.15 |
| Change, 1 year | −24.4% | −2.8% |
| Change, 5 years | 83.1% | 27.0% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.11 | 1.25 |
| Employees | 83K | 25K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 15 (better) | 6 |
| Valuation score | 4 (better) | 0 |
| Growth score | 2 (better) | 1 |
| Performance score | 4 (better) | 0 |
| Health score | 3 (better) | 2 |
| Dividend score | 2 | 3 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 17.0× | – |
| P/S | 1.5× | 1.0× (better) |
| P/B | 2.4× (better) | 2.5× |
| EV/EBITDA | 10.0× (better) | 17.9× |
| P/FCF | 23.7× | 10.7× (better) |
| PEG | 6.70 | – |
| FCF yield | 4.2% | 9.4% (better) |
| Fair value | $101.39 | $76.61 |
| Margin of safety | 10.6% (better) | −58.1% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 5.6% (better) | −7.2% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 7.7% (better) | 7.4% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 4.3% (better) | −302% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 6.0% (better) | −311% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 31.2% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 36.2% (better) | 26.0% |
| Operating margin | 13.7% (better) | 0.51% |
| Net margin | 9.2% (better) | −6.8% |
| FCF margin | 6.5% | 9.1% (better) |
| Return on equity | 14.8% (better) | −15.0% |
| Return on invested capital | 10.0% (better) | 0.43% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.79 (better) | 1.14 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 1.91 (better) | 5.28 |
| Interest coverage | 6.3× (better) | 0.1× |
| Current ratio | 1.46 (better) | 1.16 |
| Altman Z-score | 2.68 (better) | 1.97 |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 (better) | 3 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 1.3% | 2.6% (better) |
| Years of dividend growth | 4 | 12 (better) |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | 23.9% |
| Buyback yield | 1.6% | 7.1% (better) |
| Shareholder yield | 2.9% | 9.7% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 84.7% | 106% |
| Held by insiders | 0.15% | 1.3% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $445K (better) | −$447K |
| Superinvestors holding | 5 (better) | 2 |
| Short interest, % of float | 1.9% | 3.1% |
Go deeper
- CRH stock overview
- CRH income statement
- CRH valuation and score
- OC stock overview
- OC income statement
- OC valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.