Clearway Energy vs Spruce Power
CWEN and SPRU side by side, both in electric services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How CWEN and SPRU compare
Clearway Energy is the larger company, worth 251 times as much as Spruce Power ($6.9B against $27.3M).
Clearway Energy grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (21.2% versus 10.0% for Spruce Power).
Clearway Energy keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −4.8% compared with −6.8% at Spruce Power.
Clearway Energy pays a dividend yielding 5.6%; Spruce Power does not pay one.
Clearway Energy scores higher on the StockData Score (7 against 6 for Spruce Power), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | CWEN | SPRU |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $6.9B | $27.3M |
| Share price | $33.42 | $1.42 |
| Change, 1 year | −6.4% | −69.9% |
| Change, 5 years | −13.6% | −96.3% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.52 | 1.44 |
| Employees | 60 | 159 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 7 (better) | 6 |
| Valuation score | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Growth score | 2 | 2 |
| Performance score | 1 | 1 |
| Health score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Dividend score | 3 (better) | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/S | 4.1× | 0.3× (better) |
| P/B | – | 0.2× |
| EV/EBITDA | 19.9× | 11.9× (better) |
| P/FCF | 11.4× (better) | 13.8× |
| FCF yield | 8.8% (better) | 7.2% |
| Fair value | $31.15 | $3.89 |
| Margin of safety | −7.3% | 63.5% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 21.2% (better) | 10.0% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 3.6% | 40.6% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −131% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 64.1% | – |
| Operating margin | 14.0% | 22.4% (better) |
| Net margin | −4.8% (better) | −6.8% |
| FCF margin | 36.2% (better) | 1.8% |
| Return on equity | – | −6.0% |
| Return on invested capital | – | 2.6% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | – | 5.50 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 9.19 (better) | 11.31 |
| Interest coverage | 0.7× (better) | 0.5× |
| Current ratio | 1.47 (better) | 0.40 |
| Altman Z-score | 0.53 (better) | −0.61 |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 (better) | 5 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 5.6% | – |
| Buyback yield | −1.4% | 0.00% (better) |
| Shareholder yield | 4.1% (better) | 0.00% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 51.2% | 33.5% |
| Held by insiders | 83.2% | 55.8% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | – | $2.0M |
| Short interest, % of float | 21.3% | 10.0% |
Go deeper
- CWEN stock overview
- CWEN income statement
- CWEN valuation and score
- SPRU stock overview
- SPRU income statement
- SPRU valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.