Cousins Properties vs Rayonier
CUZ and RYN side by side, both in miscellaneous investing. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How CUZ and RYN compare
Rayonier is the larger company, worth 1.3 times as much as Cousins Properties ($6.4B against $4.9B).
On earnings, Rayonier is cheaper: it trades at 47.8× trailing earnings, against 329× for Cousins Properties.
Cousins Properties grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (8.5% versus 0.44% for Rayonier).
Rayonier keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 7.8% compared with 1.4% at Cousins Properties.
Both pay dividends: Cousins Properties yields 4.3% and Rayonier 4.9%.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | CUZ | RYN |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $4.9B | $6.4B |
| Share price | $29.64 | $21.50 |
| Change, 1 year | 13.5% | −2.9% |
| Change, 5 years | −24.3% | −46.2% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.91 | 0.69 |
| Employees | 351 | 285 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 8 | 8 |
| Valuation score | 3 (better) | 0 |
| Growth score | 2 (better) | 1 |
| Performance score | 1 | 1 |
| Health score | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Dividend score | 2 | 3 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 329× | 47.8× (better) |
| P/S | 4.7× (better) | 6.6× |
| P/B | 1.1× (better) | 1.2× |
| EV/EBITDA | 4.3× (better) | 136× |
| PEG | – | 0.79 |
| Fair value | $34.35 | $14.81 |
| Margin of safety | 13.7% (better) | −45.1% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 8.5% (better) | 0.44% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 6.1% (better) | −10.8% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −74.2% (better) | −90.0% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −74.3% (better) | −90.9% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | −31.6% | 62.2% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 68.4% (better) | 23.7% |
| Operating margin | 68.3% (better) | 6.0% |
| Net margin | 1.4% | 7.8% (better) |
| Return on equity | 0.32% | 2.0% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | 12.3% (better) | 1.3% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | – | 0.36 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | – | 25.02 |
| Interest coverage | 4.0× (better) | 1.3× |
| Current ratio | – | 3.56 |
| Altman Z-score | 1.05 | 1.94 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 (better) | 5 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 4.3% | 4.9% (better) |
| Payout ratio | 1445% | 393% |
| Years of dividend growth | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 1.3% | 18.2% (better) |
| Buyback yield | – | 0.05% |
| Shareholder yield | 4.3% | 5.0% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 105% | 94.2% |
| Held by insiders | 1.1% | 1.0% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$178K (better) | −$3.8M |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | 1 |
| Short interest, % of float | 8.1% | 4.9% |
Go deeper
- CUZ stock overview
- CUZ income statement
- CUZ valuation and score
- RYN stock overview
- RYN income statement
- RYN valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.