Cousins Properties vs EastGroup Properties
CUZ and EGP side by side, both in miscellaneous investing. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How CUZ and EGP compare
EastGroup Properties is the larger company, worth 2.2 times as much as Cousins Properties ($10.6B against $4.9B).
On earnings, EastGroup Properties is cheaper: it trades at 33.5× trailing earnings, against 329× for Cousins Properties.
EastGroup Properties grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (10.4% versus 8.5% for Cousins Properties).
Both pay dividends: Cousins Properties yields 4.3% and EastGroup Properties 3.2%.
Cousins Properties scores higher on the StockData Score (8 against 7 for EastGroup Properties), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | CUZ | EGP |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $4.9B | $10.6B |
| Share price | $29.64 | $197.62 |
| Change, 1 year | 13.5% | 11.1% |
| Change, 5 years | −24.3% | −3.8% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.91 | 0.81 |
| Employees | 351 | 103 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 8 (better) | 7 |
| Valuation score | 3 (better) | 1 |
| Growth score | 2 | 3 (better) |
| Performance score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Health score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Dividend score | 2 | 2 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 329× | 33.5× (better) |
| P/S | 4.7× (better) | 13.8× |
| P/B | 1.1× (better) | 3.0× |
| EV/EBITDA | 4.3× | – |
| PEG | – | 8.92 |
| Fair value | $34.35 | $158.79 |
| Margin of safety | 13.7% (better) | −24.5% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 8.5% | 10.4% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 6.1% | 14.7% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −74.2% | – |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −74.3% | 23.9% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | −31.6% | 12.0% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 68.4% | – |
| Operating margin | 68.3% | – |
| Net margin | 1.4% | – |
| Return on equity | 0.32% | – |
| Return on invested capital | 12.3% | – |
| Financial health | ||
| Interest coverage | 4.0× | – |
| Altman Z-score | 1.05 | 3.03 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 | – |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 4.3% (better) | 3.2% |
| Payout ratio | 1445% | – |
| Years of dividend growth | 0 | 14 (better) |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 1.3% | 13.9% (better) |
| Buyback yield | – | −0.65% |
| Shareholder yield | 4.3% (better) | 2.6% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 105% | 102% |
| Held by insiders | 1.1% | 1.0% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$178K (better) | −$421K |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | 1 |
| Short interest, % of float | 8.1% | 8.6% |
Go deeper
- CUZ stock overview
- CUZ income statement
- CUZ valuation and score
- EGP stock overview
- EGP income statement
- EGP valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.