CubeSmart vs Macerich
CUBE and MAC side by side, both in miscellaneous investing. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How CUBE and MAC compare
CubeSmart is the larger company, worth 1.4 times as much as Macerich ($9.6B against $6.9B).
CubeSmart grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (5.0% versus 1.3% for Macerich).
Both pay dividends: CubeSmart yields 5.0% and Macerich 2.8%.
CubeSmart scores higher on the StockData Score (10 against 5 for Macerich), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | CUBE | MAC |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $9.6B | $6.9B |
| Share price | $42.74 | $24.34 |
| Change, 1 year | 6.6% | 44.0% |
| Change, 5 years | −20.2% | 9.6% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.83 | 1.32 |
| Employees | 3,121 | 598 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 10 (better) | 5 |
| Valuation score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth score | 2 (better) | 0 |
| Performance score | 0 | 0 |
| Health score | 4 | 4 |
| Dividend score | 4 (better) | 1 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 30.1× | – |
| P/S | 8.5× | 6.9× (better) |
| P/B | 3.6× | 2.4× (better) |
| PEG | 7.14 | – |
| Fair value | $33.89 | $11.77 |
| Margin of safety | −26.1% (better) | −107% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 5.0% (better) | 1.3% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 10.6% (better) | 5.2% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −16.0% | – |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 11.4% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 68.3% | – |
| Net margin | – | −16.8% |
| Return on equity | – | −6.3% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Altman Z-score | 1.30 (better) | 0.21 |
| Piotroski F-score | – | 4 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 5.0% (better) | 2.8% |
| Years of dividend growth | 16 (better) | 0 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 9.5% (better) | −15.2% |
| Buyback yield | 0.00% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 5.0% (better) | 2.8% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 103% | 110% |
| Held by insiders | 0.88% | 0.38% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$7.3M | −$63.8K (better) |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 3.9% | 11.6% |
Go deeper
- CUBE stock overview
- CUBE income statement
- CUBE valuation and score
- MAC stock overview
- MAC income statement
- MAC valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.