CubeSmart vs Gaming & Leisure Properties
CUBE and GLPI side by side, both in miscellaneous investing. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How CUBE and GLPI compare
Gaming & Leisure Properties is the larger company, worth 1.2 times as much as CubeSmart ($11.3B against $9.6B).
On earnings, Gaming & Leisure Properties is cheaper: it trades at 11.9× trailing earnings, against 30.1× for CubeSmart.
Gaming & Leisure Properties grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (7.3% versus 5.0% for CubeSmart).
Both pay dividends: CubeSmart yields 5.0% and Gaming & Leisure Properties 8.2%.
Gaming & Leisure Properties scores higher on the StockData Score (18 against 10 for CubeSmart), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | CUBE | GLPI |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $9.6B | $11.3B |
| Share price | $42.74 | $38.98 |
| Change, 1 year | 6.6% | −10.7% |
| Change, 5 years | −20.2% | −20.1% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.83 | 0.52 |
| Employees | 3,121 | 20 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 10 | 18 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 5 (better) |
| Growth score | 2 | 3 (better) |
| Performance score | 0 | 6 (better) |
| Health score | 4 (better) | 0 |
| Dividend score | 4 | 4 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 30.1× | 11.9× (better) |
| P/S | 8.5× | 6.7× (better) |
| P/B | 3.6× | 2.3× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | – | 6.9× |
| PEG | 7.14 | 3.98 (better) |
| Fair value | $33.89 | $58.00 |
| Margin of safety | −26.1% | 32.8% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 5.0% | 7.3% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 10.6% (better) | 6.7% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | 20.7% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −16.0% | 17.6% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 11.4% (better) | 5.1% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 68.3% | – |
| Operating margin | – | 79.1% |
| Net margin | – | 55.2% |
| Return on equity | – | 19.6% |
| Return on invested capital | – | 31.0% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | – |
| Interest coverage | – | 3.5× |
| Altman Z-score | 1.30 (better) | 1.01 |
| Piotroski F-score | – | 5 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 5.0% | 8.2% (better) |
| Payout ratio | – | 98.2% |
| Years of dividend growth | 16 (better) | 1 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 9.5% (better) | 4.4% |
| Buyback yield | 0.00% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 5.0% | 8.2% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 103% | 95.3% |
| Held by insiders | 0.88% | 4.0% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$7.3M | −$3.1M (better) |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 3.9% | 3.7% |
Go deeper
- CUBE stock overview
- CUBE income statement
- CUBE valuation and score
- GLPI stock overview
- GLPI income statement
- GLPI valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.