StockData

Criteo vs WPP

CRTO and WPP side by side, both in business services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How CRTO and WPP compare

Criteo grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (−7.5% versus −8.1% for WPP).

Criteo keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 4.0% compared with −1.6% at WPP.

Criteo scores higher on the StockData Score (14 against 2 for WPP), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricCRTOWPP
Size and price
Market cap$883M–
Share price$18.03$27.79
Change, 1 year−21.1%42.6%
Change, 5 years−55.9%−62.3%
Beta (5Y)0.800.97
Employees1,18199K
StockData Score
Total score14 (better)2
Valuation score5 (better)0
Growth score1 (better)0
Performance score3 (better)2
Health score5 (better)0
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/E13.1×–
P/S0.5×–
P/B0.8×–
EV/EBITDA5.2×–
P/FCF6.7×–
PEG0.08–
FCF yield14.9%–
Fair value$33.73–
Margin of safety46.5%–
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)−7.5% (better)−8.1%
Revenue growth, 5Y average−1.3%2.5% (better)
Net income growth (TTM)−57.0% (better)−140%
EPS growth (TTM)−53.7% (better)−140%
EPS growth, 5Y average17.9%–
Profitability
Gross margin52.5% (better)15.8%
Operating margin6.6% (better)2.8%
Net margin4.0% (better)−1.6%
FCF margin7.3% (better)4.7%
Return on equity6.6% (better)−7.1%
Return on invested capital9.0% (better)3.8%
Financial health
Debt / equity0.001.94 (better)
Net debt / EBITDA–5.87
Interest coverage40.4× (better)1.1×
Current ratio1.29 (better)0.89
Altman Z-score2.18–
Piotroski F-score9–
Dividends and buybacks
Buyback yield11.6%–
Shareholder yield11.6%–
Ownership
Held by institutions83.9%2.3%
Held by insiders4.0%0.06%
Insider net buying, 12 months−$1.5M–
Short interest, % of float2.6%–

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.