Corsair Gaming vs Logitech International
CRSR and LOGI side by side, both in computer and office equipment. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How CRSR and LOGI compare
Logitech International is the larger company, worth 10 times as much as Corsair Gaming ($13.7B against $1.4B).
On earnings, Logitech International is cheaper: it trades at 17.5× trailing earnings, against 40.6× for Corsair Gaming.
Logitech International grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (6.6% versus 3.1% for Corsair Gaming).
Logitech International keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 16.3% compared with 2.5% at Corsair Gaming.
Logitech International pays a dividend yielding 1.8%; Corsair Gaming does not pay one.
Logitech International scores higher on the StockData Score (20 against 10 for Corsair Gaming), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | CRSR | LOGI |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $1.4B | $13.7B |
| Share price | $12.60 | $95.53 |
| Change, 1 year | 51.8% | −17.5% |
| Change, 5 years | −51.8% | 20.4% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.88 | 1.15 |
| Employees | 2,355 | 7,300 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 10 | 20 (better) |
| Valuation score | 2 | 5 (better) |
| Growth score | 2 | 3 (better) |
| Performance score | 1 | 5 (better) |
| Health score | 5 | 6 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 40.6× | 17.5× (better) |
| P/S | 0.9× (better) | 2.8× |
| P/B | 2.1× (better) | 5.8× |
| EV/EBITDA | 30.2× | 13.7× (better) |
| P/FCF | 15.2× | 13.5× (better) |
| PEG | – | 0.60 |
| FCF yield | 6.6% | 7.4% (better) |
| Fair value | $11.47 | $119.66 |
| Margin of safety | −9.8% | 20.2% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 3.1% | 6.6% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | −2.9% | −1.6% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | 26.0% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | 29.5% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | −2.7% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 31.6% | 45.1% (better) |
| Operating margin | 2.9% | 17.7% (better) |
| Net margin | 2.5% | 16.3% (better) |
| FCF margin | 6.2% | 20.7% (better) |
| Return on equity | 5.8% | 35.3% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | 6.9% | 116% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.18 (better) | 0.00 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | −1.73 | – |
| Current ratio | 1.75 | 2.31 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 3.05 | 8.59 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 | 8 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 1.8% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 8 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | 12.7% |
| Buyback yield | – | 3.9% |
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% | 5.6% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 37.9% | – |
| Held by insiders | 4.2% | 0.24% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $809K (better) | −$1.6M |
| Short interest, % of float | 9.3% | 8.1% |
Go deeper
- CRSR stock overview
- CRSR income statement
- CRSR valuation and score
- LOGI stock overview
- LOGI income statement
- LOGI valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.