CRH Public vs Loma Negra Compania Industrial Argentina Sociedad Anonima
CRH and LOMA side by side, both in materials. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How CRH and LOMA compare
CRH Public grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (5.6% versus −7.8% for Loma Negra Compania Industrial Argentina Sociedad Anonima).
CRH Public keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 9.2% compared with 2.8% at Loma Negra Compania Industrial Argentina Sociedad Anonima.
CRH Public pays a dividend yielding 1.3%; Loma Negra Compania Industrial Argentina Sociedad Anonima does not pay one.
CRH Public scores higher on the StockData Score (15 against 3 for Loma Negra Compania Industrial Argentina Sociedad Anonima), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | CRH | LOMA |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $60.3B | – |
| Share price | $90.62 | $9.20 |
| Change, 1 year | −24.4% | −13.3% |
| Change, 5 years | 83.1% | 29.9% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.11 | 0.62 |
| Employees | 83K | – |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 15 (better) | 3 |
| Valuation score | 4 (better) | 0 |
| Growth score | 2 (better) | 0 |
| Performance score | 4 (better) | 0 |
| Health score | 3 | 3 |
| Dividend score | 2 (better) | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 17.0× | – |
| P/S | 1.5× | – |
| P/B | 2.4× | – |
| EV/EBITDA | 10.0× | – |
| P/FCF | 23.7× | – |
| PEG | 6.70 | – |
| FCF yield | 4.2% | – |
| Fair value | $101.39 | – |
| Margin of safety | 10.6% | – |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 5.6% (better) | −7.8% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 7.7% | 47.3% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 4.3% (better) | −88.3% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 6.0% | – |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 31.2% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 36.2% (better) | 21.8% |
| Operating margin | 13.7% | – |
| Net margin | 9.2% (better) | 2.8% |
| FCF margin | 6.5% (better) | 0.30% |
| Return on equity | 14.8% (better) | 2.2% |
| Return on invested capital | 10.0% | – |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.79 | 0.28 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 1.91 | 1.47 (better) |
| Interest coverage | 6.3× | – |
| Current ratio | 1.46 (better) | 1.44 |
| Altman Z-score | 2.68 | – |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 (better) | 4 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 1.3% | – |
| Years of dividend growth | 4 | – |
| Buyback yield | 1.6% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 2.9% | – |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 84.7% | 3.5% |
| Held by insiders | 0.15% | 0.00% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $445K | – |
| Superinvestors holding | 5 | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 1.9% | – |
Go deeper
- CRH stock overview
- CRH income statement
- CRH valuation and score
- LOMA stock overview
- LOMA income statement
- LOMA valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.