CRH Public vs Cemex SAB de CV
CRH and CX side by side, both in materials. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How CRH and CX compare
CRH Public grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (5.6% versus 0.43% for Cemex SAB de CV).
CRH Public keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 9.2% compared with 6.0% at Cemex SAB de CV.
CRH Public pays a dividend yielding 1.3%; Cemex SAB de CV does not pay one.
CRH Public scores higher on the StockData Score (15 against 5 for Cemex SAB de CV), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | CRH | CX |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $60.3B | – |
| Share price | $90.62 | $10.70 |
| Change, 1 year | −24.4% | 4.2% |
| Change, 5 years | 83.1% | 68.8% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.11 | 1.28 |
| Employees | 83K | 40K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 15 (better) | 5 |
| Valuation score | 4 (better) | 0 |
| Growth score | 2 (better) | 0 |
| Performance score | 4 (better) | 3 |
| Health score | 3 (better) | 2 |
| Dividend score | 2 (better) | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 17.0× | – |
| P/S | 1.5× | – |
| P/B | 2.4× | – |
| EV/EBITDA | 10.0× | – |
| P/FCF | 23.7× | – |
| PEG | 6.70 | – |
| FCF yield | 4.2% | – |
| Fair value | $101.39 | – |
| Margin of safety | 10.6% | – |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 5.6% (better) | 0.43% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 7.7% (better) | 5.0% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 4.3% (better) | 2.2% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 6.0% (better) | 2.3% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 31.2% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 36.2% (better) | 32.9% |
| Operating margin | 13.7% (better) | 6.2% |
| Net margin | 9.2% (better) | 6.0% |
| FCF margin | 6.5% (better) | 6.4% |
| Return on equity | 14.8% (better) | 7.5% |
| Return on invested capital | 10.0% (better) | 3.0% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.79 | 0.42 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 1.91 | 1.66 (better) |
| Interest coverage | 6.3× | – |
| Current ratio | 1.46 (better) | 0.83 |
| Altman Z-score | 2.68 | – |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 | 7 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 1.3% | – |
| Payout ratio | – | 13.2% |
| Years of dividend growth | 4 | – |
| Buyback yield | 1.6% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 2.9% | – |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 84.7% | 3.7% |
| Held by insiders | 0.15% | 2.7% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $445K (better) | −$4.7M |
| Superinvestors holding | 5 (better) | 1 |
| Short interest, % of float | 1.9% | – |
Go deeper
- CRH stock overview
- CRH income statement
- CRH valuation and score
- CX stock overview
- CX income statement
- CX valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.