Crescent Energy vs Permian Resources
CRGY and PR side by side, both in crude petroleum and natural gas. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How CRGY and PR compare
Permian Resources is the larger company, worth 4.6 times as much as Crescent Energy ($21.8B against $4.7B).
Crescent Energy grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (24.3% versus 12.8% for Permian Resources).
Permian Resources keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 21.5% compared with 1.3% at Crescent Energy.
Both pay dividends: Crescent Energy yields 3.4% and Permian Resources 2.4%.
Permian Resources scores higher on the StockData Score (11 against 7 for Crescent Energy), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | CRGY | PR |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $4.7B | $21.8B |
| Share price | $14.20 | $26.02 |
| Change, 1 year | 74.4% | 108% |
| Change, 5 years | – | 240% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.85 | 0.75 |
| Employees | 1,066 | 515 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 7 | 11 (better) |
| Valuation score | 3 (better) | 0 |
| Growth score | 1 | 2 (better) |
| Performance score | 1 | 4 (better) |
| Health score | 1 | 3 (better) |
| Dividend score | 1 | 2 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 17.2× |
| P/S | 1.1× (better) | 3.8× |
| P/B | – | 1.8× |
| EV/EBITDA | 4.4× (better) | 12.0× |
| Fair value | $30.25 | $19.60 |
| Margin of safety | 53.1% (better) | −32.7% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 24.3% (better) | 12.8% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 36.5% | 54.2% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 137% (better) | 8.4% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | −1.9% |
| Profitability | ||
| Operating margin | 20.6% | 35.8% (better) |
| Net margin | 1.3% | 21.5% (better) |
| Return on equity | – | 11.5% |
| Return on invested capital | – | 11.6% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | – | 0.25 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 2.24 | 1.39 (better) |
| Interest coverage | 2.5× | 7.8× (better) |
| Current ratio | 0.94 (better) | 0.62 |
| Altman Z-score | 1.01 | 2.80 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 (better) | 4 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 3.4% (better) | 2.4% |
| Payout ratio | 256% | 40.9% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 0 |
| Buyback yield | −0.01% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 3.4% (better) | 2.4% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 91.3% | 91.3% |
| Held by insiders | 34.8% | 7.5% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$402M | −$90.7M (better) |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 17.1% | 3.7% |
Go deeper
- CRGY stock overview
- CRGY income statement
- CRGY valuation and score
- PR stock overview
- PR income statement
- PR valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.