Crescent Energy vs Expand Energy
CRGY and EXE side by side, both in crude petroleum and natural gas. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How CRGY and EXE compare
Expand Energy is the larger company, worth 4.5 times as much as Crescent Energy ($21.0B against $4.7B).
Expand Energy grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (59.3% versus 24.3% for Crescent Energy).
Expand Energy keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 20.5% compared with 1.3% at Crescent Energy.
Both pay dividends: Crescent Energy yields 3.4% and Expand Energy 2.5%.
Expand Energy scores higher on the StockData Score (16 against 7 for Crescent Energy), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | CRGY | EXE |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $4.7B | $21.0B |
| Share price | $14.20 | $90.55 |
| Change, 1 year | 74.4% | −9.8% |
| Change, 5 years | – | 37.6% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.85 | 0.58 |
| Employees | 1,066 | 1,600 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 7 | 16 (better) |
| Valuation score | 3 | 5 (better) |
| Growth score | 1 | 1 |
| Performance score | 1 | 4 (better) |
| Health score | 1 | 3 (better) |
| Dividend score | 1 | 3 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 7.8× |
| P/S | 1.1× (better) | 1.5× |
| P/B | – | 1.1× |
| EV/EBITDA | 4.4× | 3.6× (better) |
| P/FCF | – | 7.8× |
| FCF yield | – | 12.8% |
| Fair value | $30.25 | $111.34 |
| Margin of safety | 53.1% (better) | 18.7% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 24.3% | 59.3% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 36.5% (better) | 18.3% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 137% | 1250% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | 2869% |
| Profitability | ||
| Operating margin | 20.6% | 26.9% (better) |
| Net margin | 1.3% | 20.5% (better) |
| FCF margin | – | 19.7% |
| Return on equity | – | 14.9% |
| Return on invested capital | – | 12.9% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | – | 0.19 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 2.24 | 0.46 (better) |
| Interest coverage | 2.5× | 16.8× (better) |
| Current ratio | 0.94 | 0.96 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 1.01 | 2.65 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 | 7 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 3.4% (better) | 2.5% |
| Payout ratio | 256% | 27.5% |
| Buyback yield | −0.01% | 2.8% (better) |
| Shareholder yield | 3.4% | 5.3% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 91.3% | 95.3% |
| Held by insiders | 34.8% | 0.31% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$402M | $877K (better) |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | 1 |
| Short interest, % of float | 17.1% | 4.2% |
Go deeper
- CRGY stock overview
- CRGY income statement
- CRGY valuation and score
- EXE stock overview
- EXE income statement
- EXE valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.