Crawford vs CorVel
CRD.A and CRVL side by side, both in insurance agents, brokers, and service. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How CRD.A and CRVL compare
CorVel is the larger company, worth 7.4 times as much as Crawford ($4.3B against $583M).
CorVel grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (8.3% versus −3.6% for Crawford).
CorVel keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 12.0% compared with 2.0% at Crawford.
Crawford pays a dividend yielding 2.5%; CorVel does not pay one.
CorVel scores higher on the StockData Score (12 against 11 for Crawford), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | CRD.A | CRVL |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $583M | $4.3B |
| Share price | $12.00 | $85.69 |
| Change, 1 year | 3.8% | 11.0% |
| Change, 5 years | 50.0% | 31.6% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.81 | 0.68 |
| Employees | 9,943 | 5,239 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 11 | 12 (better) |
| Valuation score | 2 | 2 |
| Growth score | 1 | 3 (better) |
| Performance score | 3 | 6 (better) |
| Health score | 2 (better) | 1 |
| Dividend score | 3 (better) | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 36.0× |
| P/S | 0.4× (better) | 4.3× |
| P/B | 3.1× (better) | 10.1× |
| EV/EBITDA | 7.8× (better) | 20.8× |
| P/FCF | 8.1× (better) | 33.9× |
| PEG | – | 1.86 |
| FCF yield | 12.3% (better) | 3.0% |
| Fair value | – | $91.68 |
| Margin of safety | – | 6.5% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −3.6% | 8.3% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 5.2% | 11.6% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −19.9% | 15.4% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | 17.2% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | 20.3% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 28.2% (better) | 25.5% |
| Net margin | 2.0% | 12.0% (better) |
| FCF margin | 5.5% | 12.6% (better) |
| Return on equity | 14.0% | 30.6% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 1.21 | – |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 1.57 | – |
| Current ratio | 1.17 | 2.02 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 2.80 | 13.15 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 | 7 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 2.5% | – |
| Payout ratio | 56.7% | – |
| Buyback yield | 5.2% (better) | 1.7% |
| Shareholder yield | 7.7% (better) | 1.7% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 36.9% | 55.1% |
| Held by insiders | 26.8% | 40.2% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$15.2M (better) | −$20.9M |
| Short interest, % of float | – | 3.6% |
Go deeper
- CRD.A stock overview
- CRD.A income statement
- CRD.A valuation and score
- CRVL stock overview
- CRVL income statement
- CRVL valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.