California Resources vs Range Resources
CRC and RRC side by side, both in crude petroleum and natural gas. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How CRC and RRC compare
Range Resources is the larger company, worth 2.6 times as much as California Resources ($12.8B against $4.9B).
Range Resources grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (23.2% versus −22.5% for California Resources).
Range Resources keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 25.0% compared with −3.8% at California Resources.
Both pay dividends: California Resources yields 2.9% and Range Resources 0.71%.
California Resources scores higher on the StockData Score (10 against 9 for Range Resources), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | CRC | RRC |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $4.9B | $12.8B |
| Share price | $55.46 | $54.63 |
| Change, 1 year | 18.3% | 56.1% |
| Change, 5 years | 21.1% | 127% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.68 | 0.76 |
| Employees | 2,500 | 564 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 10 (better) | 9 |
| Valuation score | 2 (better) | 0 |
| Growth score | 2 (better) | 1 |
| Performance score | 0 | 4 (better) |
| Health score | 3 (better) | 1 |
| Dividend score | 3 | 3 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 15.1× |
| P/S | 1.5× (better) | 3.7× |
| P/B | 1.4× (better) | 2.7× |
| EV/EBITDA | 13.3× | – |
| P/FCF | 12.8× | – |
| FCF yield | 7.8% | – |
| Fair value | $59.90 | $46.91 |
| Margin of safety | 7.4% (better) | −16.5% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −22.5% | 23.2% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | – | 9.6% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −118% | 79.2% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −119% | 81.9% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | – | 93.9% |
| Operating margin | −1.7% | – |
| Net margin | −3.8% | 25.0% (better) |
| FCF margin | 12.1% | – |
| Return on equity | −3.6% | 19.5% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | −0.97% | – |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.38 | – |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 2.66 | – |
| Current ratio | 0.66 (better) | 0.65 |
| Altman Z-score | 1.48 | 3.03 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 3 | 7 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 2.9% (better) | 0.71% |
| Payout ratio | – | 10.5% |
| Years of dividend growth | 4 (better) | 1 |
| Buyback yield | 1.4% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 4.3% (better) | 0.71% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 103% | 102% |
| Held by insiders | 13.8% | 1.1% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$222M | −$4.2M (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | 5.2% | 11.3% |
Go deeper
- CRC stock overview
- CRC income statement
- CRC valuation and score
- RRC stock overview
- RRC income statement
- RRC valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.