Corebridge Financial vs Lincoln National
CRBG and LNC side by side, both in life insurance. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How CRBG and LNC compare
Corebridge Financial is the larger company, worth 2.0 times as much as Lincoln National ($15.5B against $7.9B).
Corebridge Financial grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (29.5% versus 7.9% for Lincoln National).
Lincoln National keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 12.2% compared with 4.5% at Corebridge Financial.
Both pay dividends: Corebridge Financial yields 2.8% and Lincoln National 4.4%.
Lincoln National scores higher on the StockData Score (17 against 5 for Corebridge Financial), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | CRBG | LNC |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $15.5B | $7.9B |
| Share price | $34.81 | $41.01 |
| Change, 1 year | 9.4% | 2.4% |
| Change, 5 years | – | −43.4% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.20 | 1.38 |
| Employees | 4,800 | 9,423 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 5 | 17 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 6 (better) |
| Growth score | 1 | 1 |
| Performance score | 0 | 4 (better) |
| Health score | 2 | 2 |
| Dividend score | 2 | 4 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 3.6× |
| P/S | 0.8× | 0.4× (better) |
| P/B | 1.5× | 0.7× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 7.4× | – |
| Fair value | – | $66.35 |
| Margin of safety | – | 38.2% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 29.5% (better) | 7.9% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 4.2% (better) | 0.87% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | 108% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | 101% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | 17.9% |
| Profitability | ||
| Net margin | 4.5% | 12.2% (better) |
| Return on equity | 7.9% | 22.6% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.12 | 0.04 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 0.39 | – |
| Altman Z-score | 0.13 (better) | 0.09 |
| Piotroski F-score | 4 (better) | 2 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 2.8% | 4.4% (better) |
| Payout ratio | 52.1% | 14.6% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 0 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | 2.1% |
| Buyback yield | 19.6% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 22.4% (better) | 4.4% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 109% | 85.9% |
| Held by insiders | 45.3% | 10.9% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$2.1B | −$3.6M (better) |
| Superinvestors holding | 2 (better) | 1 |
| Short interest, % of float | – | 8.5% |
Go deeper
- CRBG stock overview
- CRBG income statement
- CRBG valuation and score
- LNC stock overview
- LNC income statement
- LNC valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.