Americold Realty Trust vs Prologis
COLD and PLD side by side, both in miscellaneous investing. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How COLD and PLD compare
Prologis is the larger company, worth 29 times as much as Americold Realty Trust ($119B against $4.1B).
Prologis grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (7.3% versus −0.21% for Americold Realty Trust).
Prologis keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 45.8% compared with −17.4% at Americold Realty Trust.
Both pay dividends: Americold Realty Trust yields 6.4% and Prologis 3.3%.
Prologis scores higher on the StockData Score (11 against 4 for Americold Realty Trust), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | COLD | PLD |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $4.1B | $119B |
| Share price | $14.37 | $127.98 |
| Change, 1 year | 14.6% | 3.7% |
| Change, 5 years | −51.2% | −12.8% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.75 | 1.06 |
| Employees | 13K | 2,802 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 4 | 11 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 2 (better) |
| Growth score | 1 | 4 (better) |
| Performance score | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Health score | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend score | 3 (better) | 2 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 28.5× |
| P/S | 1.6× (better) | 13.0× |
| P/B | 1.7× (better) | 2.2× |
| EV/EBITDA | 72.7× | 15.7× (better) |
| FCF yield | −4.6% | – |
| Fair value | $2.93 | $112.97 |
| Margin of safety | −390% | −13.3% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −0.21% | 7.3% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 5.5% | 14.6% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | 22.0% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | 21.7% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | 12.1% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 31.7% | – |
| Operating margin | −12.5% | 54.7% (better) |
| Net margin | −17.4% | 45.8% (better) |
| FCF margin | −7.2% | – |
| Return on equity | −16.5% | 7.9% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | −9.6% | 9.1% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Interest coverage | −2.1× | 4.8× (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 0.08 | 1.91 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 4 | 5 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 6.4% (better) | 3.3% |
| Payout ratio | – | 92.3% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 12 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | 11.7% |
| Shareholder yield | 6.4% (better) | 3.3% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 109% | 94.6% |
| Held by insiders | 10.4% | 0.24% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$25.4K (better) | −$8.2M |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | 1 |
| Short interest, % of float | 11.4% | – |
Go deeper
- COLD stock overview
- COLD income statement
- COLD valuation and score
- PLD stock overview
- PLD income statement
- PLD valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.