Americold Realty Trust vs Lineage
COLD and LINE side by side, both in miscellaneous investing. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How COLD and LINE compare
Lineage is the larger company, worth 2.0 times as much as Americold Realty Trust ($8.2B against $4.1B).
Lineage grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (1.0% versus −0.21% for Americold Realty Trust).
Lineage keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −3.1% compared with −17.4% at Americold Realty Trust.
Both pay dividends: Americold Realty Trust yields 6.4% and Lineage 5.9%.
Lineage scores higher on the StockData Score (8 against 4 for Americold Realty Trust), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | COLD | LINE |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $4.1B | $8.2B |
| Share price | $14.37 | $36.00 |
| Change, 1 year | 14.6% | −5.9% |
| Change, 5 years | −51.2% | – |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.75 | 0.56 |
| Employees | 13K | 24K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 4 | 8 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Growth score | 1 | 1 |
| Performance score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Health score | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend score | 3 | 3 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/S | 1.6× | 1.5× (better) |
| P/B | 1.7× | 1.0× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 72.7× | 13.7× (better) |
| P/FCF | – | 33.6× |
| FCF yield | −4.6% | 3.0% (better) |
| Fair value | $2.93 | $39.23 |
| Margin of safety | −390% | 8.2% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −0.21% | 1.0% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 5.5% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 31.7% | 32.0% (better) |
| Operating margin | −12.5% | 3.6% (better) |
| Net margin | −17.4% | −3.1% (better) |
| FCF margin | −7.2% | 4.5% (better) |
| Return on equity | −16.5% | −2.0% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | −9.6% | 1.1% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | – | 0.79 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | – | 5.50 |
| Interest coverage | −2.1× | 0.7× (better) |
| Current ratio | – | 0.78 |
| Altman Z-score | 0.08 | 0.58 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 4 | 4 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 6.4% (better) | 5.9% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 2 |
| Shareholder yield | 6.4% (better) | 5.9% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 109% | 33.7% |
| Held by insiders | 10.4% | – |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$25.4K | $7.1M (better) |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | 1 |
| Short interest, % of float | 11.4% | – |
Go deeper
- COLD stock overview
- COLD income statement
- COLD valuation and score
- LINE stock overview
- LINE income statement
- LINE valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.