StockData

Concentrix vs WPP

CNXC and WPP side by side. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How CNXC and WPP compare

Concentrix grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (2.6% versus −8.1% for WPP).

WPP keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −1.6% compared with −24.0% at Concentrix.

Concentrix pays a dividend yielding 4.4%; WPP does not pay one.

Concentrix scores higher on the StockData Score (8 against 2 for WPP), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricCNXCWPP
Size and price
Market cap$2.0B–
Share price$32.72$27.79
Change, 1 year−7.4%42.6%
Change, 5 years−82.4%−62.3%
Beta (5Y)1.020.97
Employees455K99K
StockData Score
Total score8 (better)2
Valuation score3 (better)0
Growth score1 (better)0
Performance score02 (better)
Health score1 (better)0
Dividend score3 (better)0
Valuation
P/S0.2×–
P/B1.1×–
P/FCF3.5×–
FCF yield28.8%–
Fair value$98.17–
Margin of safety66.7%–
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)2.6% (better)−8.1%
Revenue growth, 5Y average15.8% (better)2.5%
Net income growth (TTM)−856%−140% (better)
EPS growth (TTM)−921%−140% (better)
Profitability
Gross margin34.1% (better)15.8%
Operating margin−20.9%2.8% (better)
Net margin−24.0%−1.6% (better)
FCF margin5.8% (better)4.7%
Return on equity−78.2%−7.1% (better)
Return on invested capital−22.3%3.8% (better)
Financial health
Debt / equity2.471.94 (better)
Net debt / EBITDA–5.87
Interest coverage–1.1×
Current ratio1.23 (better)0.89
Altman Z-score0.39–
Piotroski F-score4–
Dividends and buybacks
Dividend yield4.4%–
Buyback yield5.0%–
Shareholder yield9.4%–
Ownership
Held by institutions112%2.3%
Held by insiders13.1%0.06%
Insider net buying, 12 months−$133M–
Superinvestors holding1–
Short interest, % of float15.1%–

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.