CNA Financial vs Old Republic International
CNA and ORI side by side. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How CNA and ORI compare
CNA Financial is the larger company, worth 1.4 times as much as Old Republic International ($13.2B against $9.3B).
On earnings, Old Republic International is cheaper: it trades at 8.7× trailing earnings, against 10.7× for CNA Financial.
Old Republic International grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (12.5% versus 3.4% for CNA Financial).
Old Republic International keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 11.2% compared with 8.2% at CNA Financial.
Both pay dividends: CNA Financial yields 8.0% and Old Republic International 3.2%.
CNA Financial scores higher on the StockData Score (16 against 14 for Old Republic International), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | CNA | ORI |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $13.2B | $9.3B |
| Share price | $48.68 | $38.52 |
| Change, 1 year | 10.5% | 0.31% |
| Change, 5 years | 6.2% | 49.3% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.40 | 0.52 |
| Employees | 6,600 | 9,000 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 16 (better) | 14 |
| Valuation score | 4 | 4 |
| Growth score | 2 | 3 (better) |
| Performance score | 3 | 5 (better) |
| Health score | 2 (better) | 0 |
| Dividend score | 5 (better) | 2 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 10.7× | 8.7× (better) |
| P/S | 0.9× (better) | 0.9× |
| P/B | 1.2× (better) | 1.6× |
| EV/EBITDA | 8.9× | – |
| P/FCF | 5.8× | – |
| PEG | 0.46 (better) | 0.48 |
| FCF yield | 17.1% | – |
| Fair value | $53.50 | $41.46 |
| Margin of safety | 9.0% (better) | 7.1% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 3.4% | 12.5% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 6.8% (better) | 5.0% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 41.0% (better) | 32.1% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 41.3% (better) | 33.7% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 13.1% | 14.7% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Net margin | 8.2% | 11.2% (better) |
| FCF margin | 14.9% | – |
| Return on equity | 11.3% | 17.9% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.27 | – |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 1.48 | – |
| Altman Z-score | 0.54 | 0.80 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 7 | 7 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 8.0% (better) | 3.2% |
| Payout ratio | 85.8% | 83.2% |
| Years of dividend growth | 2 | 2 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 2.0% | 14.7% (better) |
| Buyback yield | 0.27% | 3.9% (better) |
| Shareholder yield | 8.3% (better) | 7.1% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 101% | 77.2% |
| Held by insiders | 0.53% | 0.40% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$2.7M | −$2.4M (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | 1.4% | 4.6% |
Go deeper
- CNA stock overview
- CNA income statement
- CNA valuation and score
- ORI stock overview
- ORI income statement
- ORI valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.