Chord Energy vs Range Resources
CHRD and RRC side by side, both in crude petroleum and natural gas. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How CHRD and RRC compare
Range Resources is the larger company, worth 1.5 times as much as Chord Energy ($12.8B against $8.6B).
Range Resources grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (23.2% versus 19.2% for Chord Energy).
Range Resources keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 25.0% compared with 13.4% at Chord Energy.
Both pay dividends: Chord Energy yields 3.3% and Range Resources 0.71%.
Chord Energy scores higher on the StockData Score (15 against 9 for Range Resources), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | CHRD | RRC |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $8.6B | $12.8B |
| Share price | $156.99 | $54.63 |
| Change, 1 year | 72.6% | 56.1% |
| Change, 5 years | 26.6% | 127% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.62 | 0.76 |
| Employees | 676 | 564 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 15 (better) | 9 |
| Valuation score | 3 (better) | 0 |
| Growth score | 2 (better) | 1 |
| Performance score | 3 | 4 (better) |
| Health score | 5 (better) | 1 |
| Dividend score | 2 | 3 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 15.1× |
| P/S | 1.4× (better) | 3.7× |
| P/B | 1.0× (better) | 2.7× |
| EV/EBITDA | 3.5× | – |
| Fair value | $275.93 | $46.91 |
| Margin of safety | 43.1% (better) | −16.5% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 19.2% | 23.2% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | – | 9.6% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 219% (better) | 79.2% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | 81.9% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 71.3% | 93.9% (better) |
| Operating margin | 19.0% | – |
| Net margin | 13.4% | 25.0% (better) |
| Return on equity | 10.3% | 19.5% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | 10.4% | – |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.18 | – |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 0.32 | – |
| Interest coverage | 12.1× | – |
| Current ratio | 1.22 (better) | 0.65 |
| Altman Z-score | 2.00 | 3.03 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 | 7 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 3.3% (better) | 0.71% |
| Payout ratio | 35.0% | 10.5% |
| Years of dividend growth | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Buyback yield | 3.6% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 6.9% (better) | 0.71% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 97.9% | 102% |
| Held by insiders | 0.92% | 1.1% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$11.6M | −$4.2M (better) |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 7.4% | 11.3% |
Go deeper
- CHRD stock overview
- CHRD income statement
- CHRD valuation and score
- RRC stock overview
- RRC income statement
- RRC valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.