Chagee vs Yum China
CHA and YUMC side by side, both in eating and drinking places. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How CHA and YUMC compare
Yum China grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (9.9% versus 4.0% for Chagee).
Chagee keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 9.1% compared with 7.9% at Yum China.
Yum China pays a dividend yielding 1.8%; Chagee does not pay one.
Yum China scores higher on the StockData Score (18 against 7 for Chagee), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | CHA | YUMC |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | – | $16.8B |
| Share price | $12.33 | $49.04 |
| Change, 1 year | −15.6% | 9.5% |
| Change, 5 years | – | −8.3% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.65 | 0.43 |
| Employees | 3,812 | 290K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 7 | 18 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 4 (better) |
| Growth score | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Performance score | 2 | 5 (better) |
| Health score | 5 (better) | 3 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 17.1× |
| P/S | – | 1.3× |
| P/B | – | 3.1× |
| EV/EBITDA | – | 9.1× |
| P/FCF | – | 17.7× |
| PEG | – | 0.50 |
| FCF yield | – | 5.6% |
| Fair value | – | $60.55 |
| Margin of safety | – | 19.0% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 4.0% | 9.9% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | – | 7.4% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −53.5% | 11.1% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −56.7% | 19.1% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | 5.2% |
| Profitability | ||
| Operating margin | 10.4% | 11.3% (better) |
| Net margin | 9.1% (better) | 7.9% |
| FCF margin | 9.5% (better) | 7.5% |
| Return on equity | 23.4% (better) | 18.2% |
| Return on invested capital | – | 23.7% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | 0.29 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | – | −0.06 |
| Current ratio | 3.11 (better) | 0.67 |
| Altman Z-score | – | 3.07 |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 | 7 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 1.8% |
| Payout ratio | 105% | 38.5% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 3 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | 32.0% |
| Buyback yield | – | 7.4% |
| Shareholder yield | – | 9.2% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 7.6% | 68.0% |
| Held by insiders | 86.4% | 3.9% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | – | −$10.7M |
| Superinvestors holding | – | 2 |
| Short interest, % of float | – | 1.5% |
Go deeper
- CHA stock overview
- CHA income statement
- CHA valuation and score
- YUMC stock overview
- YUMC income statement
- YUMC valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.