Chagee vs Yum Brands
CHA and YUM side by side, both in eating and drinking places. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How CHA and YUM compare
Yum Brands grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (9.1% versus 4.0% for Chagee).
Yum Brands keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 39.1% compared with 9.1% at Chagee.
Yum Brands pays a dividend yielding 1.8%; Chagee does not pay one.
Yum Brands scores higher on the StockData Score (15 against 7 for Chagee), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | CHA | YUM |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | – | $43.7B |
| Share price | $12.33 | $160.21 |
| Change, 1 year | −15.6% | 8.1% |
| Change, 5 years | – | 26.2% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.65 | 0.50 |
| Employees | 3,812 | 49K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 7 | 15 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 5 (better) |
| Growth score | 0 | 2 (better) |
| Performance score | 2 | 4 (better) |
| Health score | 5 (better) | 1 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 12.9× |
| P/S | – | 5.0× |
| EV/EBITDA | – | 12.0× |
| P/FCF | – | 27.0× |
| PEG | – | 1.92 |
| FCF yield | – | 3.7% |
| Fair value | – | $251.09 |
| Margin of safety | – | 36.2% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 4.0% | 9.1% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | – | 7.8% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −53.5% | 138% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −56.7% | 143% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | 13.6% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | – | 67.4% |
| Operating margin | 10.4% | 49.5% (better) |
| Net margin | 9.1% | 39.1% (better) |
| FCF margin | 9.5% | 18.4% (better) |
| Return on equity | 23.4% | – |
| Return on invested capital | – | 93.1% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | – |
| Net debt / EBITDA | – | 2.53 |
| Current ratio | 3.11 (better) | 0.96 |
| Altman Z-score | – | 3.44 |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 | 6 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 1.8% |
| Payout ratio | 105% | 23.6% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 8 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | 8.6% |
| Buyback yield | – | 3.2% |
| Shareholder yield | – | 5.0% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 7.6% | 89.5% |
| Held by insiders | 86.4% | 0.15% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | – | −$11.2M |
| Superinvestors holding | – | 3 |
| Short interest, % of float | – | 4.6% |
Go deeper
- CHA stock overview
- CHA income statement
- CHA valuation and score
- YUM stock overview
- YUM income statement
- YUM valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.