Chagee vs Starbucks
CHA and SBUX side by side, both in eating and drinking places. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How CHA and SBUX compare
Starbucks grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (4.5% versus 4.0% for Chagee).
Chagee keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 9.1% compared with 5.2% at Starbucks.
Starbucks pays a dividend yielding 2.4%; Chagee does not pay one.
Starbucks scores higher on the StockData Score (9 against 7 for Chagee), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | CHA | SBUX |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | – | $118B |
| Share price | $12.05 | $103.67 |
| Change, 1 year | −24.2% | 23.2% |
| Change, 5 years | – | −11.3% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.72 | 0.98 |
| Employees | 3,812 | 381K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 7 | 9 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Performance score | 2 | 3 (better) |
| Health score | 5 (better) | 3 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 2 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 59.6× |
| P/S | – | 3.1× |
| EV/EBITDA | – | 27.5× |
| P/FCF | – | 32.4× |
| FCF yield | – | 3.1% |
| Fair value | – | $52.40 |
| Margin of safety | – | −97.8% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 4.0% | 4.5% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | – | 9.6% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −53.5% | −24.7% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −56.7% | −25.0% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | 15.6% |
| Profitability | ||
| Operating margin | 10.4% (better) | 7.8% |
| Net margin | 9.1% (better) | 5.2% |
| FCF margin | 9.5% (better) | 9.5% |
| Return on equity | 23.4% | – |
| Return on invested capital | – | 53.9% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | – |
| Net debt / EBITDA | – | 2.08 |
| Interest coverage | – | 5.4× |
| Current ratio | 3.11 (better) | 0.76 |
| Altman Z-score | – | 3.15 |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 (better) | 4 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 2.4% |
| Payout ratio | 105% | 142% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 3 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | 14.8% |
| Buyback yield | – | −0.06% |
| Shareholder yield | – | 2.3% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 7.6% | 85.8% |
| Held by insiders | 86.4% | 0.09% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | – | −$1.0M |
| Superinvestors holding | – | 2 |
| Short interest, % of float | – | 3.7% |
Go deeper
- CHA stock overview
- CHA income statement
- CHA valuation and score
- SBUX stock overview
- SBUX income statement
- SBUX valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.