StockData

Cenntro vs Scage Future

CENN and SCAG side by side, both in motor vehicles and motor vehicle equipment. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How CENN and SCAG compare

Scage Future grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (82.0% versus −43.8% for Cenntro).

Scage Future keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −116% compared with −424% at Cenntro.

Cenntro scores higher on the StockData Score (7 against 1 for Scage Future), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricCENNSCAG
Size and price
Market cap$324K–
Share price$0.132$0.900
Change, 1 year−98.7%−96.8%
Change, 5 years−100.0%–
Beta (5Y)1.741.33
Employees15599
StockData Score
Total score7 (better)1
Valuation score3 (better)0
Growth score11
Performance score1 (better)0
Health score2 (better)0
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/S0.0×–
P/B0.0×–
Fair value$10.28–
Margin of safety98.7%–
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)−43.8%82.0% (better)
Profitability
Gross margin−11.6%−6.4% (better)
Operating margin−175%−121% (better)
Net margin−424%−116% (better)
FCF margin–−53.1%
Return on equity−127%–
Return on invested capital−43.5%–
Financial health
Debt / equity0.10–
Interest coverage–−39.7×
Current ratio1.65 (better)0.20
Altman Z-score−9.21–
Piotroski F-score13 (better)
Dividends and buybacks
Shareholder yield0.00%–
Ownership
Held by institutions3.0%0.06%
Held by insiders0.00%31.4%
Short interest, % of float16.2%–

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.