Constellation Energy vs ReNew Energy Global
CEG and RNW side by side, both in electric services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How CEG and RNW compare
ReNew Energy Global grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (36.2% versus 26.0% for Constellation Energy).
Constellation Energy keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 11.1% compared with 7.4% at ReNew Energy Global.
Constellation Energy pays a dividend yielding 0.60%; ReNew Energy Global does not pay one.
Constellation Energy scores higher on the StockData Score (10 against 3 for ReNew Energy Global), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | CEG | RNW |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $99.3B | – |
| Share price | $280.20 | $6.96 |
| Change, 1 year | −20.9% | −5.0% |
| Change, 5 years | 679% | −21.8% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.23 | 0.71 |
| Employees | 15K | 4,720 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 10 (better) | 3 |
| Valuation score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Growth score | 1 | 2 (better) |
| Performance score | 4 (better) | 1 |
| Health score | 2 (better) | 0 |
| Dividend score | 2 (better) | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 27.3× | – |
| P/S | 3.2× | – |
| P/B | 3.1× | – |
| EV/EBITDA | 15.0× | – |
| P/FCF | 321× | – |
| FCF yield | 0.31% | – |
| Fair value | $252.41 | – |
| Margin of safety | −11.0% | – |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 26.0% | 36.2% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 7.7% | 19.4% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 15.2% | 158% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 6.9% | 152% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Operating margin | 14.7% (better) | 10.6% |
| Net margin | 11.1% (better) | 7.4% |
| FCF margin | 0.99% | – |
| Return on equity | 15.3% (better) | 8.3% |
| Return on invested capital | 8.2% (better) | 1.3% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.77 (better) | 6.10 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 2.90 (better) | 18.29 |
| Interest coverage | 5.9× (better) | 0.2× |
| Current ratio | 1.46 (better) | 0.43 |
| Altman Z-score | 1.56 | – |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 | 6 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 0.60% | – |
| Payout ratio | 15.9% | – |
| Years of dividend growth | 3 | – |
| Shareholder yield | 0.60% | – |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 81.3% | 40.7% |
| Held by insiders | 0.28% | 82.5% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $418K | – |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 3.0% | – |
Go deeper
- CEG stock overview
- CEG income statement
- CEG valuation and score
- RNW stock overview
- RNW income statement
- RNW valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.