StockData

Cibus vs SenesTech

CBUS and SNES side by side, both in chemicals and allied products. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How CBUS and SNES compare

Cibus is the larger company, worth 18 times as much as SenesTech ($88.7M against $4.8M).

SenesTech grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (13.4% versus −10.3% for Cibus).

SenesTech keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −295% compared with −2259% at Cibus.

SenesTech scores higher on the StockData Score (10 against 4 for Cibus), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricCBUSSNES
Size and price
Market cap$88.7M$4.8M
Share price$1.16$0.893
Change, 1 year−12.8%−74.4%
Change, 5 years−99.3%−100.0%
Beta (5Y)1.740.84
Employees11823
StockData Score
Total score410 (better)
Valuation score03 (better)
Growth score13 (better)
Performance score11
Health score23 (better)
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/S20.4×2.0× (better)
P/B6.0×0.8× (better)
FCF yield−52.2% (better)−139%
Fair value$0.461$2.20
Margin of safety−151%59.5% (better)
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)−10.3%13.4% (better)
Revenue growth, 5Y average−31.3%51.1% (better)
Profitability
Gross margin–66.2%
Operating margin−1451%−304% (better)
Net margin−2259%−295% (better)
FCF margin−1066%−284% (better)
Return on equity−226%−107% (better)
Return on invested capital−311% (better)−528%
Financial health
Debt / equity0.060.02 (better)
Interest coverage–−360.4×
Current ratio1.626.78 (better)
Altman Z-score−4.46 (better)−22.43
Piotroski F-score46 (better)
Dividends and buybacks
Buyback yield–−3.6%
Shareholder yield0.00% (better)−3.6%
Ownership
Held by institutions24.2%9.1%
Held by insiders35.2%46.5%
Insider net buying, 12 months–$1.8M
Short interest, % of float6.2%1.4%

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.