Cibus vs SenesTech
CBUS and SNES side by side, both in chemicals and allied products. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How CBUS and SNES compare
Cibus is the larger company, worth 18 times as much as SenesTech ($86.4M against $4.7M).
SenesTech grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (20.9% versus 19.5% for Cibus).
SenesTech keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −275% compared with −2131% at Cibus.
SenesTech scores higher on the StockData Score (10 against 3 for Cibus), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | CBUS | SNES |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $86.4M | $4.7M |
| Share price | $1.13 | $0.862 |
| Change, 1 year | −16.3% | −71.2% |
| Change, 5 years | −99.3% | −100.0% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.73 | 0.83 |
| Employees | 118 | 23 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 3 | 10 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Growth score | 2 | 3 (better) |
| Performance score | 1 | 1 |
| Health score | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/S | 19.1× | 1.7× (better) |
| P/B | – | 1.0× |
| FCF yield | −50.7% (better) | −142% |
| Fair value | – | $2.01 |
| Margin of safety | – | 57.2% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 19.5% | 20.9% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | −31.3% | 51.1% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | – | 69.5% |
| Operating margin | −1327% | −282% (better) |
| Net margin | −2131% | −275% (better) |
| FCF margin | −966% | −239% (better) |
| Return on equity | −432% | −96.0% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | −827% | −620% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | – | 0.02 |
| Interest coverage | – | −413.3× |
| Current ratio | 0.95 | 4.51 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | −4.77 (better) | −26.91 |
| Piotroski F-score | 4 | 6 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Buyback yield | – | −8.6% |
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% (better) | −8.6% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 24.2% | 9.1% |
| Held by insiders | 35.2% | 46.5% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | – | $1.8M |
| Short interest, % of float | 6.2% | 1.4% |
Go deeper
- CBUS stock overview
- CBUS income statement
- CBUS valuation and score
- SNES stock overview
- SNES income statement
- SNES valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.