Cboe Global Markets vs StoneX
CBOE and SNEX side by side, both in security & commodity brokers, dealers, exchanges & services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How CBOE and SNEX compare
Cboe Global Markets is the larger company, worth 5.5 times as much as StoneX ($35.0B against $6.4B).
On earnings, StoneX is cheaper: it trades at 12.5× trailing earnings, against 23.9× for Cboe Global Markets.
StoneX grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (20.6% versus 14.3% for Cboe Global Markets).
Cboe Global Markets keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 28.0% compared with 0.33% at StoneX.
Cboe Global Markets pays a dividend yielding 0.69%; StoneX does not pay one.
Cboe Global Markets scores higher on the StockData Score (23 against 17 for StoneX), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | CBOE | SNEX |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $35.0B | $6.4B |
| Share price | $335.53 | $52.83 |
| Change, 1 year | 44.2% | 27.5% |
| Change, 5 years | 152% | 273% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.25 | 0.73 |
| Employees | 1,661 | 5,400 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 23 (better) | 17 |
| Valuation score | 3 | 4 (better) |
| Growth score | 4 | 4 |
| Performance score | 6 (better) | 4 |
| Health score | 6 (better) | 5 |
| Dividend score | 4 (better) | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 23.9× | 12.5× (better) |
| P/S | 6.6× | 0.0× (better) |
| P/B | 5.9× | 2.2× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 16.6× | 5.3× (better) |
| P/FCF | 13.9× | 1.7× (better) |
| PEG | 0.35 (better) | 1.28 |
| FCF yield | 7.2% | 59.4% (better) |
| Fair value | $323.98 | $87.44 |
| Margin of safety | −3.6% | 39.6% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 14.3% | 20.6% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 6.6% | 19.6% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 50.6% | 77.5% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 51.0% | 60.3% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 19.5% (better) | 9.0% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 53.9% (better) | 3.6% |
| Operating margin | 36.4% | – |
| Net margin | 28.0% (better) | 0.33% |
| FCF margin | 47.9% (better) | 2.4% |
| Return on equity | 27.4% (better) | 21.9% |
| Return on invested capital | 36.2% | – |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.24 (better) | 0.00 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | −0.62 | – |
| Interest coverage | 36.3× | – |
| Current ratio | 1.61 | – |
| Altman Z-score | 5.82 (better) | 3.05 |
| Piotroski F-score | 9 (better) | 5 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 0.69% | – |
| Payout ratio | 21.4% | – |
| Years of dividend growth | 11 | – |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 11.6% | – |
| Buyback yield | 0.38% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 1.1% (better) | 0.00% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 89.2% | 83.5% |
| Held by insiders | 0.25% | 9.1% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$2.3M (better) | −$173M |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 3.2% | 4.4% |
Go deeper
- CBOE stock overview
- CBOE income statement
- CBOE valuation and score
- SNEX stock overview
- SNEX income statement
- SNEX valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.