Intercontinental Exchange vs StoneX
ICE and SNEX side by side, both in security & commodity brokers, dealers, exchanges & services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How ICE and SNEX compare
Intercontinental Exchange is the larger company, worth 15 times as much as StoneX ($94.8B against $6.4B).
On earnings, StoneX is cheaper: it trades at 12.5× trailing earnings, against 23.0× for Intercontinental Exchange.
StoneX grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (20.6% versus 12.1% for Intercontinental Exchange).
Intercontinental Exchange keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 29.6% compared with 0.33% at StoneX.
Intercontinental Exchange pays a dividend yielding 1.2%; StoneX does not pay one.
Intercontinental Exchange scores higher on the StockData Score (19 against 17 for StoneX), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | ICE | SNEX |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $94.8B | $6.4B |
| Share price | $168.85 | $52.83 |
| Change, 1 year | 12.1% | 27.5% |
| Change, 5 years | 24.1% | 273% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.80 | 0.73 |
| Employees | 13K | 5,400 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 19 (better) | 17 |
| Valuation score | 5 (better) | 4 |
| Growth score | 2 | 4 (better) |
| Performance score | 4 | 4 |
| Health score | 4 | 5 (better) |
| Dividend score | 4 (better) | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 23.0× | 12.5× (better) |
| P/S | 6.7× | 0.0× (better) |
| P/B | 3.2× | 2.2× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 16.5× | 5.3× (better) |
| P/FCF | 18.0× | 1.7× (better) |
| PEG | 0.75 (better) | 1.28 |
| FCF yield | 5.6% | 59.4% (better) |
| Fair value | $173.33 | $87.44 |
| Margin of safety | 2.6% | 39.6% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 12.1% | 20.6% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 8.9% | 19.6% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 31.6% | 77.5% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 33.5% | 60.3% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 8.9% | 9.0% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | – | 3.6% |
| Operating margin | 40.6% | – |
| Net margin | 29.6% (better) | 0.33% |
| FCF margin | 37.6% (better) | 2.4% |
| Return on equity | 14.2% | 21.9% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | 8.5% | – |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.88 (better) | 0.00 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 3.49 | – |
| Interest coverage | 6.8× | – |
| Current ratio | 1.03 | – |
| Altman Z-score | 0.78 | 3.05 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 7 (better) | 5 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 1.2% | – |
| Payout ratio | 27.8% | – |
| Years of dividend growth | 13 | – |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 9.9% | – |
| Buyback yield | 2.1% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 3.3% (better) | 0.00% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 93.1% | 83.5% |
| Held by insiders | 0.63% | 9.1% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$91.3M (better) | −$173M |
| Superinvestors holding | 5 | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 1.2% | 4.4% |
Go deeper
- ICE stock overview
- ICE income statement
- ICE valuation and score
- SNEX stock overview
- SNEX income statement
- SNEX valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.