Chain Bridge Bancorp vs First United
CBNA and FUNC side by side, both in commercial banks. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How CBNA and FUNC compare
Chain Bridge Bancorp is the larger company, worth 1.2 times as much as First United ($344M against $299M).
On earnings, Chain Bridge Bancorp is cheaper: it trades at 10.5× trailing earnings, against 12.0× for First United.
Chain Bridge Bancorp grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (41.5% versus 11.4% for First United).
Chain Bridge Bancorp keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 43.9% compared with 26.8% at First United.
First United pays a dividend yielding 2.3%; Chain Bridge Bancorp does not pay one.
First United scores higher on the StockData Score (13 against 11 for Chain Bridge Bancorp), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | CBNA | FUNC |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $344M | $299M |
| Share price | $52.35 | $46.26 |
| Change, 1 year | 76.4% | 29.4% |
| Change, 5 years | – | 134% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.74 | 0.68 |
| Employees | 84 | 343 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 11 | 13 (better) |
| Valuation score | 1 | 2 (better) |
| Growth score | 1 | 1 |
| Performance score | 3 | 3 |
| Health score | 6 (better) | 3 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 4 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 10.5× (better) | 12.0× |
| P/S | 4.6× | 3.2× (better) |
| P/B | 1.8× | 1.4× (better) |
| P/FCF | 14.5× | 11.5× (better) |
| PEG | – | 134.96 |
| FCF yield | 6.9% | 8.7% (better) |
| Fair value | $46.03 | $39.63 |
| Margin of safety | −13.7% (better) | −16.7% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 41.5% (better) | 11.4% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | – | 5.7% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 76.3% (better) | 5.5% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 74.8% (better) | 6.0% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | 13.9% |
| Profitability | ||
| Net margin | 43.9% (better) | 26.8% |
| FCF margin | 31.7% (better) | 27.9% |
| Return on equity | 18.5% (better) | 12.4% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | 0.33 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 0.21 | 0.29 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 3 | 6 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 2.3% |
| Payout ratio | – | 25.9% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 7 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | 13.0% |
| Buyback yield | – | −0.12% |
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% | 2.2% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 33.5% | 49.5% |
| Held by insiders | 32.2% | 4.6% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$14.1K (better) | −$503K |
| Short interest, % of float | 4.7% | 1.2% |
Go deeper
- CBNA stock overview
- CBNA income statement
- CBNA valuation and score
- FUNC stock overview
- FUNC income statement
- FUNC valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.