Chubb vs Everest
CB and EG side by side, both in fire, marine, and casualty insurance. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How CB and EG compare
Chubb is the larger company, worth 9.0 times as much as Everest ($141B against $15.7B).
On earnings, Everest is cheaper: it trades at 9.0× trailing earnings, against 13.0× for Chubb.
Chubb grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (5.7% versus −8.7% for Everest).
Chubb keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 18.2% compared with 11.7% at Everest.
Both pay dividends: Chubb yields 0.81% and Everest 1.4%.
Everest scores higher on the StockData Score (13 against 11 for Chubb), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | CB | EG |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $141B | $15.7B |
| Share price | $370.33 | $423.74 |
| Change, 1 year | 28.5% | 28.9% |
| Change, 5 years | 96.7% | 58.6% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.37 | 0.40 |
| Employees | 45K | 3,064 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 11 | 13 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 6 (better) |
| Growth score | 3 (better) | 2 |
| Performance score | 4 (better) | 2 |
| Health score | 2 (better) | 0 |
| Dividend score | 2 | 3 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 13.0× | 9.0× (better) |
| P/S | 2.3× | 1.0× (better) |
| P/B | 1.9× | 1.1× (better) |
| PEG | 0.47 | 0.25 (better) |
| Fair value | $321.78 | $587.10 |
| Margin of safety | −15.1% | 27.8% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 5.7% (better) | −8.7% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 10.5% | 12.8% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 16.1% | 243% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 19.3% | 256% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 26.9% (better) | 24.2% |
| Profitability | ||
| Net margin | 18.2% (better) | 11.7% |
| Return on equity | 15.5% (better) | 12.8% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.01 | – |
| Altman Z-score | 1.00 (better) | 0.86 |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 | 6 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 0.81% | 1.4% (better) |
| Payout ratio | 13.7% | 16.7% |
| Years of dividend growth | 3 | 4 (better) |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | 5.2% |
| Buyback yield | 3.1% | 10.2% (better) |
| Shareholder yield | 4.0% | 11.6% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 91.3% | 105% |
| Held by insiders | 0.33% | 1.6% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$50.1M | −$3.4M (better) |
| Superinvestors holding | 4 (better) | 1 |
| Short interest, % of float | 0.79% | 4.2% |
Go deeper
- CB stock overview
- CB income statement
- CB valuation and score
- EG stock overview
- EG income statement
- EG valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.